The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated Syntenic and Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal an Ancient Genome Duplication in Monocots
Abstract
Unraveling widespread polyploidy events throughout plant evolution is a necessity for inferring the impacts of whole-genome duplication (WGD) on speciation, functional innovations, and to guide identification of true orthologs in divergent taxa. Here, we employed an integrated syntenic and phylogenomic analyses to reveal an ancient WGD that shaped the genomes of all commelinid monocots, including grasses, bromeliads, bananas (Musa acuminata), ginger, palms, and other plants of fundamental, agricultural, and/or horticultural interest. First, comprehensive phylogenomic analyses revealed 1421 putative gene families that retained ancient duplication shared by Musa (Zingiberales) and grass (Poales) genomes, indicating an ancient WGD in monocots. Intergenomic synteny blocks of Musa and Oryza were investigated, and 30 blocks were shown to be duplicated before Musa-Oryza divergence an estimated 120 to 150 million years ago. Synteny comparisons of four monocot (rice [Oryza sativa], sorghum [Sorghum bicolor], banana, and oil palm [Elaeis guineensis]) and two eudicot (grape [Vitis vinifera] and sacred lotus [Nelumbo nucifera]) genomes also support this additional WGD in monocots, herein called Tau (τ). Integrating synteny and phylogenomic comparisons achieves better resolution of ancient polyploidy events than either approach individually, a principle that is exemplified in the disambiguation of a WGD series of rho (ρ)-sigma (σ)-tau (τ) in the grass lineages that echoes the alpha (α)-be…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In some taxa, synteny is preserved across hundreds of millions of years of evolution and is retained over multiple WGDs (Jiao et al., 2014; Simakov et al., 2020; Zhao and Schranz, 2019).”
From GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes (2022) · cites this paper as Jiao et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates
Mayrose, I., Zhan, S. H., Rothfels, C. J., Magnuson-Ford, K., Barker, M. S., Rieseberg, L. H., & Otto, S. P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207205 · Cited by 489
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes
Lovell, J. T., Sreedasyam, A., Schranz, M. E., Wilson, M., Carlson, J. W., Harkess, A., Emms, D., Goodstein, D. M., & Schmutz, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78526 · Cited by 391
Plant Phenylalanine/Tyrosine Ammonia-lyases
Barros, J., & Dixon, R. A. (2020) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.011 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiao, Y., Li, J., Tang, H., & Paterson, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602
- Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350002, China
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2792-2802
- ISSN
- 1040-4651
- 1532-298X
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review