Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates
Abstract
The doubling of genomes does not cause increased plant speciation unless the progenitor lineages are highly fit.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most polyploid speciation events do not lead to long-term evolutionary success.
“These findings therefore indicate that most polyploid speciation events do not lead to long-term evolutionary success (Mayrose et al., 2011).”
From Genomics of plant speciation (2023) · cites this paper as Mayrose et al., 2011
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879 · see citing works
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977 · see citing works
Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H., & Painter, I. S. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025892 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194 · see citing works
Bock, D. G., Cai, Z., Elphinstone, C., González-Segovia, E., Hirabayashi, K., Huang, K., Keais, G. L., Kim, A., Owens, G. L., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2023) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100599 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“These findings therefore indicate that most polyploid speciation events do not lead to long-term evolutionary success (Mayrose et al., 2011).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mayrose, I., Zhan, S. H., Rothfels, C. J., Magnuson-Ford, K., Barker, M. S., Rieseberg, L. H., & Otto, S. P.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Duke University (US)
- Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mayrose, Itay
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2011-09-02
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 6047
- Pages
- 1257-1257
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2151956719
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 38.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Keywords
- polyploidy, polyploidization, speciation rates, extinction rates, macroevolution, vascular plants, diploids, polyploids, diversification rates
- MeSH terms
- Diploidy, Biological Evolution, Polyploidy, Genome, Plant, Magnoliopsida, Ferns, Genetic Speciation, Extinction, Biological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
