The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SUT2, a Putative Sucrose Sensor in Sieve Elements
Open accessAbstract
In leaves, sucrose uptake kinetics involve high- and low-affinity components. A family of low- and high-affinity sucrose transporters (SUT) was identified. SUT1 serves as a high-affinity transporter essential for phloem loading and long-distance transport in solanaceous species. SUT4 is a low-affinity transporter with an expression pattern overlapping that of SUT1. Both SUT1 and SUT4 localize to enucleate sieve elements of tomato. New sucrose transporter-like proteins, named SUT2, from tomato and Arabidopsis contain extended cytoplasmic domains, thus structurally resembling the yeast sugar sensors SNF3 and RGT2. Features common to these sensors are low codon bias, environment of the start codon, low expression, and lack of detectable transport activity. In contrast to LeSUT1, which is induced during the sink-to-source transition of leaves, SUT2 is more highly expressed in sink than in source leaves and is inducible by sucrose. LeSUT2 protein colocalizes with the low- and high-affinity sucrose transporters in sieve elements of tomato petioles, indicating that multiple SUT mRNAs or proteins travel from companion cells to enucleate sieve elements. The SUT2 gene maps on chromosome V of potato and is linked to a major quantitative trait locus for tuber starch content and yield. Thus, the putative sugar sensor identified colocalizes with two other sucrose transporters, differs from them in kinetic properties, and potentially regulates the relative activity of low- and high-affinity sucrose transport into sieve elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SUGAR SENSING AND SIGNALING IN PLANTS: Conserved and Novel Mechanisms
Rolland, F., Baena-Gonzalez, E., & Sheen, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441 · Cited by 2,328
Chen, L.-Q., Cheung, L. S., Feng, L., Tanner, W., & Frommer, W. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033904 · Cited by 507
Self-citationPhloem loading and unloading of sugars and amino acids
LALONDE, S., TEGEDER, M., THRONE‐HOLST, M., FROMMER, W. B., & PATRICK, J. W. (2003) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00847.x · Cited by 438
Self-citationSucrose: metabolite and signaling molecule
Wind, J., Smeekens, S., & Hanson, J. (2010) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.07.007 · Cited by 392
Little, D. Y., Rao, H., Oliva, S., Daniel-Vedele, F., Krapp, A., & Malamy, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504219102 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, L., Kühn, C., Weise, A., Schulz, A., Gebhardt, C., Hirner, B., Hellmann, H., Schulze, W., Ward, J. M., & Frommer, W. B.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1153-1164
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2101491249
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUT2, a Putative Sucrose Sensor in Sieve Elements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.12.7.1153
- The paper
- Barker, L., Kühn, C., Weise, A., Schulz, A., Gebhardt, C., Hirner, B., Hellmann, H., Schulze, W., Ward, J. M., & Frommer, W. B. (2000). SUT2, a Putative Sucrose Sensor in Sieve Elements. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.7.1153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.