The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genomic Analysis of a Nutrient Response in Arabidopsis Reveals Diverse Expression Patterns and Novel Metabolic and Potential Regulatory Genes Induced by Nitrate
Open accessAbstract
Microarray and RNA gel blot analyses were performed to identify Arabidopsis genes that responded to nitrate at both low (250 microM) and high (5 to 10 mM) nitrate concentrations. Genes involved directly or indirectly with nitrite reduction were the most highly induced by nitrate. Most of the known nitrate-regulated genes (including those encoding nitrate reductase, the nitrate transporter NRT1, and glutamate synthase) appeared in the 40 most strongly nitrate-induced genes/clones on at least one of the microarrays of the 5524 genes/clones investigated. Novel nitrate-induced genes were also found, including those encoding (1) possible regulatory proteins, including an MYB transcription factor, a calcium antiporter, and putative protein kinases; (2) metabolic enzymes, including transaldolase and transketolase of the nonoxidative pentose pathway, malate dehydrogenase, asparagine synthetase, and histidine decarboxylase; and (3) proteins with unknown functions, including nonsymbiotic hemoglobin, a senescence-associated protein, and two methyltransferases. The primary pattern of induction observed for many of these genes was a transient increase in mRNA at low nitrate concentrations and a sustained increase when treated with high nitrate concentrations. Other patterns of induction observed included transient inductions after both low and high nitrate treatments and sustained or increasing amounts of mRNA after either treatment. Two genes, AMT1;1 encoding an ammonium transporter and ANR1 encoding a MADS-box factor, were repressed by nitrate. These findings indicate that nitrate induces not just one but many diverse responses at the mRNA level in Arabidopsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway: structure and organisation
Kruger, N. J., & von Schaewen, A. (2003) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00039-6 · Cited by 835
Wang, R., Okamoto, M., Xing, X., & Crawford, N. M. (2003) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.021253 · Cited by 678
Self-citationMa, L., Li, J., Qu, L., Hager, J., Chen, Z., Zhao, H., & Deng, X. W. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010229 · Cited by 561
Genomic Analysis of the Nitrate Response Using a Nitrate Reductase-Null Mutant of Arabidopsis
Wang, R., Tischner, R., Gutiérrez, R. A., Hoffman, M., Xing, X., Chen, M., Coruzzi, G., & Crawford, N. M. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.044610 · Cited by 448
Self-citationRegulation of amino acid metabolic enzymes and transporters in plants
Pratelli, R., & Pilot, G. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru320 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, R., Guegler, K., LaBrie, S. T., & Crawford, N. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1491-1509
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2098225750
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Analysis of a Nutrient Response in Arabidopsis Reveals Diverse Expression Patterns and Novel Metabolic and Potential Regulatory Genes Induced by Nitrate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.12.8.1491
- The paper
- Wang, R., Guegler, K., LaBrie, S. T., & Crawford, N. M. (2000). Genomic Analysis of a Nutrient Response in Arabidopsis Reveals Diverse Expression Patterns and Novel Metabolic and Potential Regulatory Genes Induced by Nitrate. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.8.1491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.