The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic and molecular analysis of an allelic series of cop1 mutants suggests functional roles for the multiple protein domains.
Open accessAbstract
The Arabidopsis protein COP1, encoded by the constitutive photomorphogenic locus 1, is an essential regulatory molecule that plays a role in the repression of photomorphogenic development in darkness and in the ability of light-grown plants to respond to photoperiod, end-of-day far-red treatment, and ratio of red/far-red light. The COP1 protein contains three recognizable structural domains: starting from the N terminus, they are the zinc binding motif, the putative coiled-coil region, and the domain with multiple WD-40 repeats homologous to the beta subunit of trimeric G-proteins (G beta). To understand the functional implications of these structural motifs, 17 recessive mutations of the COP1 gene have been isolated based on their constitutive photomorphogenic seedling development in darkness. These mutations define three phenotypic classes: weak, strong, and lethal. The mutations that fall into the lethal class are possible null mutations of COP1. Molecular analysis of the nine mutant alleles that accumulated mutated forms of COP1 protein revealed that disruption of the G beta-protein homology domain or removal of the very C-terminal 56 amino acids are both deleterious to COP1 function. In-frame deletions or insertions of short amino acid stretches between the putative coiled-coil and G beta-protein homology domains strongly compromised COP1 function. However, a mutation resulting in a COP1 protein with only the N-terminal 282 amino acids, including both the zinc binding and the coiled-coil domains, produced a weak phenotypic defect. These results indicated that the N-terminal half of COP1 alone retains some activity and a disrupted C-terminal domain masks this remaining activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences.
Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M., & Stock, J. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 · Cited by 3,953
Cited by
Oyama, T., Shimura, Y., & Okada, K. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.22.2983 · Cited by 833
Favory, J., Stec, A., Gruber, H., Rizzini, L., Oravecz, A., Funk, M., Albert, A., Cloix, C., Jenkins, G. I., Oakeley, E. J., et al. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.4 · Cited by 699
Casal, J. J. (2012) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0157 · Cited by 382
Shen, H., Zhu, L., Castillon, A., Majee, M., Downie, B., & Huq, E. (2008) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.108.060020 · Cited by 293
Photoreceptor-mediated regulation of the COP1/SPA E3 ubiquitin ligase
Podolec, R., & Ulm, R. (2018) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.04.018 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- McNellis, T. W., von Arnim, A. G., Araki, T., Komeda, Y., Miséra, S., & Deng, X. W.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 487-500
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W1989001617
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.