The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Light control of seedling morphogenetic pattern.
Open accessAbstract
Plant development is characterized by a high degree of plasticity in response to environmental signals. As s e d e organisms, plants cannot actively move away from sources of stress, nor can they seek out a location with optimal nutrient and light resources. Instead, they must tailor their developmental pattern in a way that maximizes their chances of survival and reproduction. A plant’s “choice” of developmental pattern is based largely on environmental cues, one of the most important of these being light. Given the importance of photosynthesis to plant survival, it comes as no surprise that higher plants respond to light signals by assuming a growth pattern that enhances their access and exposure to light. This control of plant form by ambient light conditions is generally termed photomorphogenesis (Kendrick and Kronenberg, 1994). The light environment in nature is complex. Unobstructed sunlight consists of a wide continuum of photon wavelengths that is conveniently divided into three large spectral domains: UV ( 700 nm) light (Figure 1A). The spectral quality, or relative photon distribution, at different wavelengths can vary greatly, depending on the location and the time of day. For example, within the canopy, the light available is essentially depleted in the visible and UV regions, and far-red light is highly represented (Figure 1A). Furthermore, twilight normally has a higher farred to red ratio than daylight (Smith, 1994). Although higher plants effectively utilize only visible light for photosynthesis, they have the capability to sense and respond to a much wider range of the spectrum, including UV and far-red light. For example, the effectiveness of different wavelengths of continuous light at inhibiting hypocotyl elongation of dark-grown Sinapis alba seedlings (Beggs et al., 1980) is shown in Figure 1B. It is evident that multiple spectral regions of light, including blue, red, and far-red, all are very effective at inhibiting hypocotyl elongation, suggesting that S. alba seedlings are capable of perceiving all of these light signals and utilizing them to control seedling morphogenesis. Plant responses to light are especially evident in the young seedling, although they occur throughout the life of the plant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oyama, T., Shimura, Y., & Okada, K. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.22.2983 · Cited by 833
Johkan, M., Shoji, K., Goto, F., Hashida, S.-N., & Yoshihara, T. (2010) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.45.12.1809 · Cited by 624
Phytochrome Signaling Mechanisms
Li, J., Li, G., Wang, H., & Wang Deng, X. (2011) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0148 · Cited by 561
Fan, X.-X., Xu, Z.-G., Liu, X.-Y., Tang, C.-M., Wang, L.-W., & Han, X.-L. (2013) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.01.017 · Cited by 419
Nagashima, A., Suzuki, G., Uehara, Y., Saji, K., Furukawa, T., Koshiba, T., Sekimoto, M., Fujioka, S., Kuroha, T., Kojima, M., et al. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03358.x · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- McNellis, T. W., & Deng, X. W.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1749-1761
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2096379617
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light control of seedling morphogenetic pattern. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.7.11.1749
- The paper
- McNellis, T. W., & Deng, X. W. (1995). Light control of seedling morphogenetic pattern. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.11.1749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.