The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Small cysteine-rich antifungal proteins from radish: their role in host defense.
Open accessAbstract
Radish seeds have previously been shown to contain two homologous, 5-kD cysteine-rich proteins designated Raphanus sativus-antifungal protein 1 (Rs-AFP1) and Rs-AFP2, both of which exhibit potent antifungal activity in vitro. We now demonstrate that these proteins are located in the cell wall and occur predominantly in the outer cell layers lining different seed organs. Moreover, Rs-AFPs are preferentially released during seed germination after disruption of the seed coat. The amount of released proteins is sufficient to create a microenvironment around the seed in which fungal growth is suppressed. Both the cDNAs and the intron-containing genomic regions encoding the Rs-AFP preproteins were cloned. Transcripts (0.55 kb) hybridizing with an Rs-AFP1 cDNA-derived probe were present in near-mature and mature seeds. Such transcripts as well as the corresponding proteins were barely detectable in healthy uninfected leaves but accumulated systemically at high levels after localized fungal infection. The induced leaf proteins (designated Rs-AFP3 and Rs-AFP4) were purified and shown to be homologous to seed Rs-AFPs and to exert similar antifungal activity in vitro. A chimeric Rs-AFP2 gene under the control of the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter conferred enhanced resistance to the foliar pathogen Alternaria longipes in transgenic tobacco. The term "plant defensins" is proposed to denote these defense-related proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Cited by
Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: A focus on PR peptides
Sels, J., Mathys, J., De Coninck, B. M. A., Cammue, B. P. A., & De Bolle, M. F. C. (2008) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.06.011 · Cited by 836
Antimicrobial Peptides from Plants
Broekaert, W. F., Cammue, B. P. A., De Bolle, M. F. C., Thevissen, K., De Samblanx, G. W., Osborn, R. W., & Nielson, K. (1997) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689709701952 · Cited by 678
Self-citationAntimicrobial peptides and plant disease control
Montesinos, E. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00683.x · Cited by 376
Epple, P., Apel, K., & Bohlmann, H. (1997) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.9.4.509 · Cited by 355
Peptide promiscuity: An evolutionary concept for plant defense
Franco, O. L. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.008 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Terras, F. R., Eggermont, K., Kovaleva, V, Raikhel, N. V., Osborn, R. W., Kester, A., Rees, S. B., Torrekens, S., Van Leuven, F., & Vanderleyden, J.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 573-588
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2156907261
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small cysteine-rich antifungal proteins from radish: their role in host defense. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.7.5.573
- The paper
- Terras, F. R., Eggermont, K., Kovaleva, V, Raikhel, N. V., Osborn, R. W., Kester, A., Rees, S. B., Torrekens, S., Van Leuven, F., & Vanderleyden, J. (1995). Small cysteine-rich antifungal proteins from radish: their role in host defense. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.5.573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.