Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plant Disease Resistance Genes: Function Meets Structure.

Open access
Bent, A. F.·1996·The Plant Cell

Abstract

The coevolution of interacting plants and microbes has given rise to a diverse array of exchanged signals and responses. Microbes that elicit a host response can be met variously with hospitable acceptance (as is the case with symbionts such as nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium bacteria), with tardy recognition and moderately effective defenses (as for most interactions that result in disease), or with a strong and rapid defense response that blocks further infection (Dixon and Lamb, 1990; Keen, 1990; Long and Staskawicz, 1993). This latter form of disease resistance forms the subject of this review and is known variously as race-specific resistance, gene-for-gene resistance, or hypersensitive resistance. Activation of gene-for-gene resistance typically depends on specific recognition of the invading pathogen by the plant (Keen, 1990). Numerous individual plant genes have been identified that control gene-for-gene resistance, and these genes are known as resistance (R) genes. Study of gene-for-gene resistance might be justified solely by the intrigue of plant-pathogen coevolution or as a model for signal transduction research in which an organism perceives and responds to its environment. However, the topic takes on greater interest dueto its pivotal impact on crop health and food production. Plant diseases cause billions of dollars in lost harvest annually, and in some instances, these losses have severe consequences for humans (Agrios, 1988; Schumann, 1991). One of the most convenient, inexpensive, and environmentally sound ways to control plant disease is to utilize disease-resistam varieties, and plant breeders make extensive use of classically defined R genes (Agrios, 1988). Recent work has revealed the structure of a number of plant R genes, and a striking degree of similarity among these genes has been observed. After briefly introducing the subject of R genes and avirulence (Avo genes, this review provides an overview of the conserved structural components that are predicted in the proteins encoded by R genes. The cloning of R genes has stimulated additional research that is also discussed, including structure-function analysis of R gene-encoded proteins, isolation of additional R genes, identification of functionally related components of the defense signal transduction cascade, and engineering of improved disease resistance in plants. RESISTANCE GENES, AVIRULENCE GENES, AND PLANT DEFENSE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1757

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Bent, A. F.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
1757-1771
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2167009782
Cited by
546
References
1
FWCI
79.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Disease Resistance Genes: Function Meets Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.8.10.1757
The paper
Bent, A. F. (1996). Plant Disease Resistance Genes: Function Meets Structure. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.10.1757

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.