The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of the proline knot motif in oleosin endoplasmic reticulum topology and oil body targeting.
Open accessAbstract
An Arabidopsis oleosin was used as a model to study oleosin topology and targeting to oil bodies. Oleosin mRNA was in vitro translated with canine microsomes in a range of truncated forms. This allowed proteinase K mapping of the membrane topology. Oleosin maintains a conformation with a membrane-integrated hydrophobic domain flanked by N- and C-terminal domains located on the outer microsome surface. This is a unique membrane topology on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Three universally conserved proline residues within the "proline knot" motif of the oleosin hydrophobic domain were substituted by leucine residues. After in vitro translation, only minor differences in proteinase K protection could be observed. These differences were not apparent in soybean microsomes. No significant difference in incorporation efficiency on the ER was observed between the two oleosin forms. However, as an oleosin-beta-glucuronidase translational fusion, the proline knot variant failed to target to oil bodies in both transient embryo expression and in stably transformed seeds. Fractionation of transgenic embryos expressing oleosin-beta-glucuronidase fusions showed that the proline knot variant accumulated in the ER to similar levels compared with the native form. Therefore, the proline knot motif is not important for ER integration and the determination of topology but is required for oil body targeting. The loss of the proline knot results in an intrinsic instability in the oleosin polypeptide during trafficking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New variation on the translocation of proteins during early biogenesis of apolipoprotein B
Chuck, S. L., Yao, Z., Blackhart, B. D., McCarthy, B. J., & Lingappa, V. R. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346382a0 · Cited by 100
Cited by
The biophysics and cell biology of lipid droplets
Thiam, A. R., Farese Jr, R. V., & Walther, T. C. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3699 · Cited by 986
Wilfling, F., Wang, H., Haas, J. T., Krahmer, N., Gould, T. J., Uchida, A., Cheng, J.-X., Graham, M., Christiano, R., Fröhlich, F., et al. (2013) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.01.013 · Cited by 806
Shimada, T. L., Shimada, T., & Hara‐Nishimura, I. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04060.x · Cited by 420
Biogenesis and functions of lipid droplets in plants
Chapman, K. D., Dyer, J. M., & Mullen, R. T. (2012) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r021436 · Cited by 396
Microarray Analysis of Developing Arabidopsis Seeds
Girke, T., Todd, J., Ruuska, S., White, J., Benning, C., & Ohlrogge, J. (2000) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.124.4.1570 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Abell, B. M., Holbrook, L. A., Abenes, M., Murphy, D. J., Hills, M. J., & Moloney, M. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1481-1493
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2105383906
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of the proline knot motif in oleosin endoplasmic reticulum topology and oil body targeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.9.8.1481
- The paper
- Abell, B. M., Holbrook, L. A., Abenes, M., Murphy, D. J., Hills, M. J., & Moloney, M. M. (1997). Role of the proline knot motif in oleosin endoplasmic reticulum topology and oil body targeting. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.8.1481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.