Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7,928

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy

Blessing, R. H.·1995·Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography

Abstract

A least-squares procedure is described for modeling an empirical transmission surface as sampled by multiple symmetry-equivalent and/or azimuth rotation-equivalent intensity measurements. The fitting functions are sums of real spherical harmonic functions of even order, ylm(-u0) + ylm(u1), 2 < or = l = 2n < or = 8. The arguments of the functions are the components of unit direction vectors, -u0 for the reverse incident beam and u1 for the scattered beam, referred to crystal-fixed Cartesian axes. The procedure has been checked by calculations against standard absorption test data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0108767394005726

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 7,928

Metadata

Authors
Blessing, R. H.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
33-38
ISSN
0108-7673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144332006
Cited by
7,928
References
0
FWCI
30.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0108767394005726
The paper
Blessing, R. H. (1995). An empirical correction for absorption anisotropy. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767394005726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.