The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significant progress in predicting the crystal structures of small organic molecules – a report on the fourth blind test
Open accessAbstract
We report on the organization and outcome of the fourth blind test of crystal structure prediction, an international collaborative project organized to evaluate the present state in computational methods of predicting the crystal structures of small organic molecules. There were 14 research groups which took part, using a variety of methods to generate and rank the most likely crystal structures for four target systems: three single-component crystal structures and a 1:1 cocrystal. Participants were challenged to predict the crystal structures of the four systems, given only their molecular diagrams, while the recently determined but as-yet unpublished crystal structures were withheld by an independent referee. Three predictions were allowed for each system. The results demonstrate a dramatic improvement in rates of success over previous blind tests; in total, there were 13 successful predictions and, for each of the four targets, at least two groups correctly predicted the observed crystal structure. The successes include one participating group who correctly predicted all four crystal structures as their first ranked choice, albeit at a considerable computational expense. The results reflect important improvements in modelling methods and suggest that, at least for the small and fairly rigid types of molecules included in this blind test, such calculations can be constructively applied to help understand crystallization and polymorphism of organic molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Cited by
Integrated Materials Design of Organic Semiconductors for Field-Effect Transistors
Mei, J., Diao, Y., Appleton, A. L., Fang, L., & Bao, Z. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja400881n · Cited by 1,443
Static and lattice vibrational energy differences between polymorphs
Nyman, J., & Day, G. M. (2015) · CrystEngComm · doi:10.1039/c5ce00045a · Cited by 438
Self-citationAshbrook, S. E., & McKay, D. (2016) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c6cc02542k · Cited by 283
Porous Organic Cage Nanocrystals by Solution Mixing
Hasell, T., Chong, S. Y., Jelfs, K. E., Adams, D. J., & Cooper, A. I. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja209156v · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, G. M., Cooper, T. G., Cruz-Cabeza, A. J., Hejczyk, K. E., Ammon, H. L., Boerrigter, S. X. M., Tan, J. S., Della Valle, R. G., Venuti, E., Jose, J., Gadre, S. R., Desiraju, G. R., Thakur, T. S., van Eijck, B. P., Facelli, J. C., Bazterra, V. E., Ferraro, M. B., Hofmann, D. W. M., Neumann, M. A., Leusen, F. J. J., Kendrick, J., Price, S. L., Misquitta, A. J., Karamertzanis, P. G., Welch, G. W. A., Scheraga, H. A., Arnautova, Y. A., Schmidt, M. U., van de Streek, J., Wolf, A. K., & Schweizer, B.
- Venue
- Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
- Published
- 2009-03-16
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-125
- ISSN
- 0108-7681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105976401
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significant progress in predicting the crystal structures of small organic molecules – a report on the fourth blind test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0108768109004066
- The paper
- Day, G. M., Cooper, T. G., Cruz-Cabeza, A. J., Hejczyk, K. E., Ammon, H. L., Boerrigter, S. X. M., Tan, J. S., Della Valle, R. G., Venuti, E., Jose, J., Gadre, S. R., Desiraju, G. R., Thakur, T. S., van Eijck, B. P., Facelli, J. C., Bazterra, V. E., Ferraro, M. B., Hofmann, D. W. M., Neumann, M. A., . . . Schweizer, B. (2009). Significant progress in predicting the crystal structures of small organic molecules – a report on the fourth blind test. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768109004066
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.