Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,558

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals

Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C., Bernstein, J.·1990·Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science

Abstract

A method is presented based on graph theory for categorizing hydrogen-bond motifs in such a way that complex hydrogen-bond patterns can be disentangled, or decoded, systematically and consistently. This method is based on viewing hydrogen-bond patterns topologically as if they were intertwined nets with molecules as the nodes and hydrogen bonds as the lines. Surprisingly, very few parameters are needed to define the hydrogen-bond motifs comprising these networks. The methods for making these assignments, and examples of their chemical utility are given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0108768189012929

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,558

Metadata

Authors
Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C., & Bernstein, J.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
Published
1990-04-01
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
256-262
ISSN
0108-7681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978633893
Cited by
2,558
References
0
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0108768189012929
The paper
Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C., & Bernstein, J. (1990). Graph-set analysis of hydrogen-bond patterns in organic crystals. Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768189012929

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.