The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement
Abstract
Many crystallographic protein structures are being determined using molecular replacement (MR), a model-based phasing method that has become increasingly important with the steady growth of the PDB. While there are several highly automated software packages for MR, the methods for preparing optimal search models for MR are relatively unexplored. Recent advances in sequence-comparison methods allow the detection of more distantly related homologs and more accurate alignment of their sequences. It was investigated whether simple homology models (without modeling of unaligned regions) based on alignments from these improved methods are able to increase the potential of MR. 27 crystal structures were determined using a highly parallelized MR pipeline that facilitates all steps including homology detection, model preparation, MR searches, automated refinement and rebuilding. Several types of search models prepared with standard sequence-sequence alignment (BLAST) and more accurate profile-sequence and profile-profile methods (PSI-BLAST, FFAS) were compared in MR trials. The analysis shows that models based on more accurate alignments have a higher success rate in cases where the unknown structure and the search model share less than 35% sequence identity. It is concluded that by using different types of simple models based on accurate alignments, the success rate of MR can be significantly increased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phaser crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller
Eswar, N., Webb, B., Marti‐Renom, M. A., Madhusudhan, M. S., Eramian, D., Shen, M., Pieper, U., & Sali, A. (2006) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0506s15 · Cited by 4,478
Macromolecular Modeling with Rosetta
Das, R., & Baker, D. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062906.171838 · Cited by 989
The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures
Adams, P. D., Afonine, P. V., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Echols, N., Headd, J. J., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., Kapral, G. J., Grosse Kunstleve, R. W., et al. (2011) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.07.005 · Cited by 891
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“Models with such high accuracy have been shown to be useful even for refining crystallographic structures by the method of molecular replacement (Howell et al., 1992; Baker and Sali, 2001; Jones, 2001; Claude et al., 2004; Schwarzenbacher et al., 2004).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarzenbacher, R., Godzik, A., Grzechnik, S. K., & Jaroszewski, L.
- Venue
- Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography
- Published
- 2004-06-22
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1229-1236
- ISSN
- 0907-4449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079093876
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1107/s0907444904010145
- The paper
- Schwarzenbacher, R., Godzik, A., Grzechnik, S. K., & Jaroszewski, L. (2004). The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444904010145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.