The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent developments in classical density modification
Open accessAbstract
Classical density-modification techniques (as opposed to statistical approaches) offer a computationally cheap method for improving phase estimates in order to provide a good electron-density map for model building. The rise of statistical methods has lead to a shift in focus away from the classical approaches; as a result, some recent developments have not made their way into classical density-modification software. This paper describes the application of some recent techniques, including most importantly the use of prior phase information in the likelihood estimation of phase errors within a classical density-modification framework. The resulting software gives significantly better results than comparable classical methods, while remaining nearly two orders of magnitude faster than statistical methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coot : model-building tools for molecular graphics
Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. (2004) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444904019158 · Cited by 30,571
Self-citation
Cited by
Features and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 29,915
Self-citationOverview of the CCP 4 suite and current developments
Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan, K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., Keegan, R. M., Krissinel, E. B., Leslie, A. G. W., McCoy, A., et al. (2011) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910045749 · Cited by 12,353
Self-citationLatent TGF-β structure and activation
Shi, M., Zhu, J., Wang, R., Chen, X., Mi, L., Walz, T., & Springer, T. A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10152 · Cited by 1,013
Structural basis for Cul3 protein assembly with the BTB-Kelch family of E3 ubiquitin ligases
Canning, P., Cooper, C. D. O., Krojer, T., Murray, J. W., Pike, A. C. W., Chaikuad, A., Keates, T., Thangaratnarajah, C., Hojzan, V., Marsden, B. D., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.437996 · Cited by 284
“Alternatively, phases were calculated using molecular replacement with PHASER (37) and density modification conducted with PARROT (38).”
Structural basis and regulation of the reductive stress response
Manford, A. G., Mena, E. L., Shih, K. Y., Gee, C. L., McMinimy, R., Martínez-González, B., Sherriff, R., Lew, B., Zoltek, M., Rodríguez-Pérez, F., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.002 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowtan, K.
- Venue
- Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography
- Published
- 2010-03-24
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470-478
- ISSN
- 0907-4449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111482169
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
