The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management system
Abstract
Purpose: Building on previous studies of the managerial application and development of the 5S concept (5S), this research aims to identify and present key concepts of 5S from a Japanese management perspective. These findings link 5S to aspects of Japanese management approach, which are aligned to an integrated management system rather than a simple management tool or technique. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from Japanese companies that use 5S as a core management approach and use their organisational web sites to disseminate information in regard to this practise. The data were examined by the use of computer‐aided lexical analysis (Leximancer), which provided an insight into the nature of 5S within the original Japanese context. Findings: The research found several key concepts behind the Japanese approach to 5S management. These findings demonstrate the importance of both the technical (visible) and philosophical (invisible) approaches required for each of the 5S components and are discussed in a managerial rather than cultural framework. Practical implications: The findings are important both theoretically and practically as they provide insight into the meaning and logic, applied to the application of the 5S management approach within its original environmental context. Originality/value: The originality and value of the paper is derived from the holistic understanding of the application of 5S and its use as a problem‐solving intervention at the system or process level; a necessary initiating point within lean management philosophies. 5S within the context identified is the strategic platform for the managerial decisions required for the development of an integrated management system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
The machine that changed the world
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90400-v · Cited by 5,805
(1980) · Methodology · Cited by 3,570
Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking
Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570410558049 · Cited by 1,664
Zauberman, A., Preobrazhensky, E., Pearce, B., & Nove, A. (1966) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2552632 · Cited by 644
Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools
Pavnaskar, S. J., Gershenson, J. K., & Jambekar, A. B. (2003) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/0020754021000049817 · Cited by 466
Zutshi, A., & Sohal, A. S. (2005) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410380510576840 · Cited by 276
The New Lean Toolbox: Towards Fast, Flexible Flow
Bicheno, J. (2004) · Cited by 216
Organizational Communication: Challenges for the New Century
Jones, E. (2004) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/54.4.722 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Kanamori, S., Sow, S., Castro, M. C., Matsuno, R., Tsuru, A., & Jimba, M. (2015) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v8.27256 · Cited by 104
Order in the courts: propagating a culture of efficiency within the Irish Court Services
Bumblauskas, D., & Kalghatgi, S. (2018) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2018.1449468 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Gapp, R., Fisher, R., & Kobayashi, K.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-05-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 565-579
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153148043
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00251740810865067
- The paper
- Gapp, R., Fisher, R., & Kobayashi, K. (2008). Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management system. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810865067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.