Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools

Pavnaskar, S. J., Gershenson, J. K., Jambekar, A. B.·2003·International Journal of Production Research

Abstract

For the past few years almost every manufacturing industry has been trying to get 'lean'. A headlong rush to become lean also resulted in many misapplications of existing lean manufacturing tools often due to inadequate understanding of the purpose of tools. While tool descriptions abound, there is no way systematically to link a manufacturing organization to its problems and to the possible tools to eliminate these problems. The main purpose of this paper is to propose a classification scheme to serve as a link between manufacturing waste problems and lean manufacturing tools. A manufacturing organization can then match its manufacturing wastes with the appropriate lean manufacturing tools. The classification of existing knowledge is often the first step in moving from a practice to a science. This classification scheme systematically organizes lean manufacturing tools and metrics according to their level of abstraction, appropriate location of application of the tool in the organization, whether it addresses management waste or activity waste, the type of resource waste it addresses, and whether it identifies waste, measures waste, eliminates waste, or a combination of the three. We have organized 101 lean manufacturing tools and metrics using this classification scheme. We have also described some common manufacturing problems using this classification scheme and shown the problem-tool connection through examples. The classification scheme is not intended as a decision-making tool, i.e. it does not decide if something is a waste. However, the proposed scheme does an excellent job of classifying all well-known lean manufacturing tools and metrics and suggests lean manufacturing tools and metrics that will help to address manufacturing problems. This classification scheme will assist companies trying to become lean and can serve as a foundation for research into the science of lean.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0020754021000049817

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Pavnaskar, S. J., Gershenson, J. K., & Jambekar, A. B.
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2003-01
Volume
41
Issue
13
Pages
3075-3090
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
OpenAlex
W1998109490
Cited by
466
References
0
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0020754021000049817
The paper
Pavnaskar, S. J., Gershenson, J. K., & Jambekar, A. B. (2003). Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754021000049817

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.