The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this paper is to collate and debate the main issues driving the stakeholder theory academic debate. Design/methodology/approach: First, a discussion of the stakeholder concept is set out before moving on to the history and nature of stakeholder theory. The work proceeds with an attempt to bring together systematically the points of divergence among researchers interested in stakeholder theory, and, finally, there is a brief discussion of these theoretical loopholes in conjunction with a proposed research agenda for the field. Findings: Based on the unification of the theoretically problematic issues, research agenda are put forward with the objective of clarifying doubts and resolving the controversies ongoing among academics. As regards the formulation of stakeholder theory, one question requiring resolution is that of the stakeholder concept itself. Additionally, further research should focus on the boundaries as to what constitutes a stakeholder group as well as defining the criteria for attributing individual membership of one or another group. In practical theoretical application, it is correspondingly necessary to target research on aspects such as conflicts of interest between stakeholders and management difficulties in coping with multiple objectives. Finally, there is a need for research that systematizes the knowledge produced with the objective of attaining the theoretical convergence necessary for the development of stakeholder theory. Originality/value: The main contribution of this paper derives from the systematization of the various shortcomings that need overcoming within the framework of stakeholder theory and the identification of research agendas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258888 · Cited by 7,838
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259247 · Cited by 5,039
Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410210749 · Cited by 4,004
Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::aid-smj150>3.0.co;2-h · Cited by 3,661
Corporate Culture and Performance
Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992) · Cited by 3,367
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FIRM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256342 · Cited by 3,146
INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS
Jones, T. M. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924 · Cited by 3,102
Cited by
A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships
Wagner Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211279648 · Cited by 259
Self-citationThe changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective
Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12064 · Cited by 253
(2015) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-03-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-252
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074766466
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 80.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00251741111109133
- The paper
- Wagner Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2011). Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111109133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.