CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 423Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesVocational and Entrepreneurial EducationHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entrepreneurship education at university: a driver in the creation of high growth firms?

Galloway, Laura, Brown, Wendy·2002·Education + Training
DOI 10.1108/00400910210449231
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is, in the UK, increasing attention being paid to the potential of university education to facilitate high quality growth firms. While some commentators believe that this potential can be realised in the short term, many believe that only a long‐term view of the entrepreneurial potential of graduate entrepreneurship is feasible as new graduates lack the resources, skills and experience necessary for sustainability and growth of ventures. Like most university entrepreneurship “departments”, the Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship at the University of Strathclyde examines the profile of students and outcome of entrepreneurship electives in terms of student ambition and motivation. Using data from this exercise along with data from a study of 2,000 Strathclyde alumni, an impression of potentiality and actual outcome of entrepreneurship electives is possible.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00400910210449231

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hayward, G. and Sundes, O. (1997), Evaluating Entrepreneurship Education in Scottish Universities, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  2. Levie, J., Brown, W. and Steele (Galloway), L. (2001), “How entrepreneurial are Strathclyde alumni? an international comparison”, paper presented at 4th McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
  3. Scottish Executive (2000), “Nichol Stephen call for growth of pioneering graduate enterprise scheme”, press release SE2574/2000.
  4. Upton, N.B., Sexton, D.L. and Moore, C. (1995), “Have we made a difference? an examination of career activity of entrepreneurship majors since 1981”, Frontiers of Research, paper presented at Babson College‐Kauffman Foundation Entrepreneurship Research Conference.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 423

Related

Metadata

Authors
Galloway, L., & Brown, W.
Affiliations
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Education + Training
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
44
Issue
8/9
Pages
398-405
ISSN
0040-0912 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/00400910210449231
OpenAlex
W2080881463
Cited by
423
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
  • Education + Training (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
entrepreneurship education, university entrepreneurship, high-growth firms, graduate entrepreneurship, alumni outcomes, venture sustainability, University of Strathclyde

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review