The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping with multiple dimensions of work‐family conflict
Abstract
One way to reduce work‐family conflict is for individuals to have the ability to effectively cope with the stressful demands. The relationships between four styles of work and family coping (direct action, help‐seeking, positive thinking, and avoidance/resignation) and levels of work‐family conflict are considered. Two different forms of work‐family conflict (time‐based and strain‐based) were examined as well as the effect of direction (work interfering with family, family interfering with work) to examine the efficacy of different coping styles. Help‐seeking and direct action coping used at home were associated with lower family interfering with work conflict levels. Avoidance/resignation coping was associated with higher conflict levels of all types. The results suggest individuals may have greater control and opportunity for positive change within the family domain compared with the work environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791 · cited 2×
“Emotion-focused coping has been cited as an effective coping style with organizational stress because individuals often have little ability to change work-related stressors, making problem-focused styles ineffective (Aryee et al., 1999; Pearlin and Schooler, 1978).”
BackgroundConsequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research.
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278 · Cited by 2,767
Cited by
Telecommuting’s differential impact on work–family conflict: Is there no place like home?
Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340 · Cited by 527
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotondo, D. M., Carlson, D. S., & Kincaid, J. F.
- Venue
- Personnel Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-296
- ISSN
- 0048-3486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126593090
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coping with multiple dimensions of work‐family conflict. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00483480310467606
- The paper
- Rotondo, D. M., Carlson, D. S., & Kincaid, J. F. (2003). Coping with multiple dimensions of work‐family conflict. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310467606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
