Libraries and student persistence at southern colleges and universities
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this paper is to determine whether or how academic libraries affect student achievement. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses computation of Pearson's r coefficients and predictor values for correlations of academic library statistics with first‐year retention and six‐year graduation rates reported to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System by Southern Regional Education Board four‐year colleges and universities in 2010. Findings Book collection size in doctoral university libraries has the strongest correlation with retention and graduation rates, in the sample, and predicts for every 10 percent increase a 0.5 percent improvement in retention and a 0.7 percent higher graduation rate. Originality/value The paper documents the first impact study to correlate library statistics with both retention and graduation rates from a large sample of doctoral, Masters' and bachelors' degree‐conferring institutions. It calculates 21 predictor values of interest to academic administrators.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teske et al. (2013) found predictor values of reference transactions, book expenditure, acquisitions, collection sizes, and circulation for retention and graduation rates.
“While the study discovered predictor values of reference transactions, book expenditure, acquisitions, collection sizes, and circulation for retention and graduation rates, there was no discussion about the impact of the library in OER initiatives.”
From Equitable student success via library support for textbooks (2020) · cites this paper as Teske et al. (2013)
Cites
Uncovering Meaningful Correlation between Student Academic Performance and Library Material Usage
Wong, S. H. R., & Webb, T. D. (2011) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl-129 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Academic Library Resources on Undergraduates’ Degree Completion
Soria, K., & Fransen, J. (2017) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.78.6.812 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The Impact of Library Instruction on Undergraduate Student Success: A Four-Year Study
Rowe, J., Leuzinger, J., Hargis, C., & Harker, K. (2021) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.82.1.7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Equitable student success via library support for textbooks
Wimberley, L., Cheney, E., & Ding, Y. (2020) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0024 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Teske, B., DiCarlo, M., & Cahoy, D.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana Tech University (US)
- ORCID
- Cahoy, Dexter
- Venue
- Reference Services Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-06-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-279
- ISSN
- 0090-7324 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069817358
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reference Services Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- academic libraries, student retention, graduation rates, first-year retention, library statistics, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review