Cited by 885Library Science and Information LiteracyAcademic Writing and PublishingMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Conducting a literature review

Rowley, Jennifer, Slack, Frances·2004·Management Research News

Abstract

This article offers support and guidance for students undertaking a literature review as part of their dissertation during an undergraduate or Masters course. A literature review is a summary of a subject field that supports the identification of specific research questions. A literature review needs to draw on and evaluate a range of different types of sources including academic and professional journal articles, books, and web-based resources. The literature search helps in the identification and location of relevant documents and other sources. Search engines can be used to search web resources and bibliographic databases. Conceptual frameworks can be a useful tool in developing an understanding of a subject area. Creating the literature review involves the stages of: scanning, making notes, structuring the literature review, writing the literature review, and building a bibliography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01409170410784185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowley, J., & Slack, F.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Venue
Management Research News
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2004-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
31-39
ISSN
0140-9174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033494546
Cited by
885
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Management Research News (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
literature searching, bibliographic databases, search engines, conceptual framework, research question formulation, undergraduate graduation thesis, student research skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review