Social withdrawal as invisible youth disengagement: Government inaction and NGO responses in Hong Kong
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to critically discuss state inaction on and NGO responses to the hidden problem of youth disengagement in the form of social withdrawal. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on data drawn from six focus groups of social workers working with youths experiencing the problem of social withdrawal and another 30 individual interviews with service users having had this vulnerable background. Findings Substantiated with empirical findings, the paper argues that young people in social withdrawal characterized by their socially avoidant behavior and deprivation of an engagement status as a worker, student or trainee are largely invisible to the state because of the latter's insensitivity to the heterogeneity and diversity of disengaged youth and reproduction of the anti‐social notion of at‐risk youth. A flexible and tailor‐made strategy initiated by an NGO is argued to be more effective in meeting the needs of silently‐disengaged young people. Originality/value This paper critically examines state inaction on the problem of youth disengagement in the form of social withdrawal and argues the importance of adopting a flexible and tailor‐made strategy with regard to both outreaching and service provision efforts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Job-training, vocational skills and reengagement with education are components of effective hidden youth interventions and build the youth's academic and vocational competence.
“Job-training (22), vocational skills and reengagement with education (39), which are components of effective hidden youth interventions, also build the youth's academic and vocational competence.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, T. M., & Wong, P. W. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415581179 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Khiatani, S., Liu, D., Yeo, B. S. S., & Wong, J. C. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1133659 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Job-training (22), vocational skills and reengagement with education (39), which are components of effective hidden youth interventions, also build the youth’s academic and vocational competence.”
Background
- Authors
- Wong, V.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wong, Victor
- ORCID
- Wong, Victor
- Venue
- International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-07-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7/8
- Pages
- 415-430
- ISSN
- 0144-333X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1528030114
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Keywords
- youth disengagement, social withdrawal, at-risk youth, state inaction, social invisibility, social workers, service users, social exclusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review