Cited by 188Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth Education and Societal Dynamics

Youth social withdrawal behavior (hikikomori): A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

Li, Tim MH, Wong, Paul WC·2015·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Acute and/or severe social withdrawal behavior among youth was seen as a culture-bound psychiatric syndrome in Japan, but more youth social withdrawal cases in different countries have been discovered recently. However, due to the lack of a formal definition and diagnostic tool for youth social withdrawal, cross-cultural observational and intervention studies are limited. We aimed to consolidate existing knowledge in order to understand youth social withdrawal from diverse perspectives and suggest different interventions for different trajectories of youth social withdrawal. Method This review examined the current available scientific information on youth social withdrawal in the academic databases: ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and PubMed. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of socially withdrawn youths published in English and academic peer-reviewed journals. Results We synthesized the information into the following categories: (1) definitions of youth social withdrawal, (2) developmental theories, (3) factors associated with youth social withdrawal and (4) interventions for socially withdrawn youths. Accordingly, there are diverse and controversial definitions for youth social withdrawal. Studies of youth social withdrawal are based on models that lead to quite different conclusions. Researchers with an attachment perspective view youth social withdrawal as a negative phenomenon, whereas those who adopt Erikson's developmental theory view i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867415581179

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, T. M., & Wong, P. W.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
595-609
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2127550345
Cited by
188
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Keywords
hikikomori, developmental theory, attachment theory, Erikson's psychosocial development, risk factors, intervention, cross-cultural comparison, theoretical framework
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Social Behavior Disorders, Social Isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review