The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between total quality management practices and organizational culture
Abstract
Purpose: This empirical study explores the relationship between total quality management (TQM) practices and organizational culture with the purpose of identifying the particular cultures that determine the successful implementation of TQM practices. Specifically, it tests two competing views on the relationship; the unitarist and pluralist views. Design/methodology/approach: The empirical data was drawn from 194 organizations in Australia. The research model employs the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria as TQM framework and builds on the competing values model to frame organizational culture. The data was analysed using structural equation modelling technique. Findings: The findings support the pluralist view, wherein different subsets of TQM practices are determined by different types of cultures. Interestingly, hierarchical culture was found to have a significant relationship with certain practices of TQM. Additionally, the findings indicate that although the cultural factors underpinning different elements of TQM are dissimilar, even antagonistic, organizations can implement them in harmony. Practical implications: The major implication of this study is that organizations need to accommodate divergent goals by developing a system and/or structure that allows enough flexibility for adapting different (even contrasting) management styles, between control and flexibility and between internal and external orientations, so that they may gain benefits from the multiple dimensions of TQM. Originality/value: This paper provides empirical evidence on the multidimensionality of TQM practices along with their association with different types of culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices
Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013 · Cited by 678
Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.017 · Cited by 432
The place of waste: Changing business value for the circular economy
Perey, R., Benn, S., Agarwal, R., & Edwards, M. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2068 · Cited by 199
The impact of shop floor culture and subculture on lean production practices
Losonci, D., Kása, R., Demeter, K., Heidrich, B., & Jenei, I. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2014-0524 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Prajogo, D. I., & McDermott, C. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1101-1122
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986476154
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between total quality management practices and organizational culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570510626916
- The paper
- Prajogo, D. I., & McDermott, C. M. (2005). The relationship between total quality management practices and organizational culture. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510626916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.