The place of waste: Changing business value for the circular economy
Abstract
Traditionally, wasted resources are considered a burden that imposes a cost on organizations. However, ecological sustainability principles underpinning the linked discourses of industrial ecology and the Circular Economy conceptualize waste as intrinsically valuable. Our research identified exemplar business organizations that had each changed their business models to resolve the tension of waste as a burden and/or resource. Synthesizing these cases, we found these organizations applied systems thinking to reframe their product and service offerings and developed material circular flows in their business models. Analysis of how our exemplar organizations changed their business models to tackle pressing sustainability issues and to resolve the burden–resource tension show that the focus of change is on reconceptualizing their understanding of the role of waste in the value chain of their products and services. This altered understanding of waste as a resource across their value networks initiated negotiations with their existing suppliers to also modify their supply chain practices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to recent research in circular economy, some actor in the value chain has to take the lead and start thinking about circular economy first internally, then absorb the concepts, and then influence other actors and lead the initiatives that will occur collaboratively.
“However, according to recent research in CE [47], some actor in the value chain has to take the lead and start thinking about CE first internally, then absorb the concepts, and then influence other actors and lead the initiatives that will occur collaboratively.”
From Configuring New Business Models for Circular Economy through Product–Service Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 60 · Cited by 199
- Authors
- Perey, R., Benn, S., Agarwal, R., & Edwards, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Perey, Robert
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 631-642
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W2883748945
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 27.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- waste as resource, circular economy, business model innovation, industrial ecology, value chain, systems thinking, supplier collaboration, supply chain management practices, environmental sustainability, value networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review