The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review
Abstract
Purpose: A growing body of literature has begun to recognise that in the era of supply chain management it is important to look beyond the flexible factory to the flexible supply chain. This paper seeks to further our understanding of supply chain flexibility and provide a comprehensive review of the available literature. Design/methodology/approach: Published literature on supply chain flexibility has been considered. Where appropriate, additional insights have been obtained from related streams such as manufacturing flexibility, agility and supply chain responsiveness. Findings: Much of the existing research has a limited definition of supply chain flexibility and describes flexibility simply as a reactive means to cope with uncertainty. Supply chain flexibility has emerged from the manufacturing flexibility literature and hence to date is largely confined to a manufacturing context (neglecting the role of services). Empirical research often takes the form of a cross‐sectional postal questionnaire conducted at the firm‐level that fails to explore the inter‐organisational components of supply chain flexibility. Originality/value: The paper presents a timely review of the available literature and provides a more complete definition of flexibility in the context of supply chains. It is argued that future empirical research should approach research design from a network perspective, treating the supply chain as the unit of analysis, in order to develop a more complete understanding of the effects of flexibility across the whole supply chain. The paper also explores combining a flexible supply chain strategy with proactive means of reducing unwanted supply chain uncertainty, focusing on the roles of supply chain design, supply chain collaboration and inter‐organisational information systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
Cited by
Kache, F., & Seuring, S. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2015-0078 · Cited by 938
Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability
Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.068 · Cited by 351
Cloud computing in manufacturing: The next industrial revolution in Malaysia?
Ooi, K.-B., Lee, V.-H., Tan, G. W.-H., Hew, T.-S., & Hew, J.-J. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.009 · Cited by 341
Delic, M., & Eyers, D. R. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689 · Cited by 325
Shekarian, M., & Mellat Parast, M. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2020.1763935 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevenson, M., & Spring, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-06-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 685-713
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968736185
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570710756956
- The paper
- Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.