The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to explore the types of innovation that are predominant in UK SMEs, whether they are predominantly radical or incremental, and to investigate the impact of these innovations on performance. Design/methodology/approach: A web‐based survey instrument was used to administer survey questionnaires to a sample of UK SMEs in manufacturing, engineering, electronics, information technology and telecommunications industries. The response rate was 13.8 percent. Relevant statistical analytical techniques including regression for analysis was then used. Findings: It is found that the SMEs tend to focus more on incremental than radical innovations and that this focus is related to growth in sales turnover. Practical implications: It is not such a bad idea for SMEs, particularly those operating in high technological industries, to focus on incremental innovations as these are actually related positively to sales turnover growth. Originality/value: An investigation of the types of innovation that SMEs pursue is pioneering in the field as previous studies of this type have been based on large firms. The contention that the raison d'etre of SMEs is to develop radical innovations is not supported empirically, at least for the sample of SMEs. In addition, it is found that the age of an SME is not related to its focus on either incremental or radical innovation. These are the contributions of this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention
Bird, B. (1988) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306970 · Cited by 2,508
Vos, H. (1946) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/000271624624500109 · Cited by 2,041
PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices
Griffin, A. (1997) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1460429 · Cited by 1,490
Innovation Management And New Product Development
Trott, P. (2002) · Cited by 1,371
Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development
Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(95)00059-3 · Cited by 1,226
An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact
Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1986) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90030-5 · Cited by 1,034
Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems
Hudson, M., Smart, A., & Bourne, M. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005587 · Cited by 855
Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success
de Brentani, U. (2001) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/s0737-6782(01)00071-6 · Cited by 672
Cited by
Rosli, M. M., & Sidek, S. (2013) · Journal of Innovation Management in Small & Medium Enterprise · doi:10.5171/2013.885666 · Cited by 265
McDowell, W. C., Peake, W. O., Coder, L., & Harris, M. L. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.025 · Cited by 257
Service innovation and performance in SMEs
McDermott, C. M., & Prajogo, D. I. (2012) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571211208632 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Oke, A., Burke, G., & Myers, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-06-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 735-753
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969879012
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570710756974
- The paper
- Oke, A., Burke, G., & Myers, A. (2007). Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756974
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.