On the relationship between inventory and financial performance in manufacturing companies
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between inventory performance, both total inventory (INV) and its discrete components (raw material (RMI), work‐in‐process (WIP), and finished goods (FGI)), and financial performance in manufacturing companies. Design/methodology/approach: Statistical analysis is applied to the financial information of US‐based manufacturing firms over the 26‐year period from 1980 to 2005. Findings: The paper finds a significant positive correlation between inventory performance (total as well as the discrete components of inventory) and measures of financial performance (at both the gross and operating levels) for firms in manufacturing industries. The correlation between the performance of discrete types of inventory and financial performance varies significantly across inventory types. RMI performance has the highest correlation with all financial performance measures. Between WIP inventory and FGI performance, the former is more highly correlated with gross profit measures while the latter is more highly correlated with operating profit measures. Originality/value: This paper is the first to systematically analyze the relationship between inventory performance and financial performance for a large sample of firms across all manufacturing industries. The paper adds to prior literature by discussing and testing the relationship between both INV performance and the discrete types of inventory (RMI, WIP, and FGI) and profitability of operations, both at the gross and at the operating profit levels. The paper also analyzes the results for firms across as well as within manufacturing industries. The results obtained support the operations management literature's claim that a managerial focus on inventory performance results in value creation for manufacturing firms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective inventory management is a strategic tool to improve performance.
“Effective inventory management is a strategic tool to improve performance (Capkun et al., 2009;Muchaendepi et al., 2019;Hashed & Shaik, 2022).”
From The impact of inventory management on Vietnam's industrial firm performance: A double-threshold regression approach (2025) · cites this paper as Capkun et al., 2009
Cites
An Econometric Analysis of Inventory Turnover Performance in Retail Services
Gaur, V., Fisher, M. L., & Raman, A. (2005) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0298 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Sine, W. D., Shane, S., & Gregorio, D. D. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416 · Cited by 330 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The halo effect is the effect where past financial performance significantly affects current performance ( Sine et al. , 2003”
BackgroundThe impact of just-in-time manufacturing on firm performance in the US
Huson, M., & Nanda, D. (1995) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/0272-6963(95)00011-g · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lean, leaner, too lean? The inventory–performance link revisited
Eroglu, C., & Hofer, C. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.05.002 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980
Kroes, J. R., Manikas, A. S., & Gattiker, T. F. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.006 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Afrifa, G. A., Alshehabi, A., Tingbani, I., & Halabi, H. (2021) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-020-00903-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Anh Vu Thi, H., & Thanh Hoang, T. (2025) · Investment Management and Financial Innovations · doi:10.21511/imfi.22(4).2025.05 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Capkun, V., Hameri, A., & Weiss, L. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Tufts University (US)
- ORCID
- Hameri, Ari‐Pekka
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-07-17
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 789-806
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047111871
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 26.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Working Capital and Financial Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Keywords
- inventory performance, financial performance, manufacturing companies, raw material inventory, work-in-process inventory, finished goods inventory, gross profit, operating profit, value creation, inventory management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review