The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, the field of manufacturing strategy has developed many different approaches. Argues that there are three distinct paradigms in manufacturing strategy: competing through manufacturing; strategic choices in manufacturing; and best practice. Each is reviewed and its strengths and weaknesses discussed. Finally, the relationship between them is discussed and a cycle of manufacturing strategy is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
The machine that changed the world
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90400-v · Cited by 5,805
Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1998) · The Economic Impact of Knowledge · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50023-9 · Cited by 2,180
Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice
Woodward, J. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,031
Stalk, G., & Hout, T. M. (1990) · Research-Technology Management · doi:10.1080/08956308.1990.11670646 · Cited by 1,269
Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory
Ferdows, K., & De Meyer, A. (1990) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-t · Cited by 1,230
Skinner, W. (1974) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,129
A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies
Miller, J. G., & Roth, A. V. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.3.285 · Cited by 1,016
The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility
Upton, D. M. (1994) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165745 · Cited by 974
Jaikumar, R. (1986) · Harvard business review · Cited by 748
Cited by
Contingency research in operations management practices
Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.001 · Cited by 996
Self-citationTotal productive maintenance: literature review and directions
Ahuja, I. P. S., & Khamba, J. S. (2008) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656710810890890 · Cited by 574
Challenges in transforming manufacturing organisations into product‐service providers
Martinez, V., Bastl, M., Kingston, J., & Evans, S. (2010) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410381011046571 · Cited by 567
An examination of the relationships between JIT and financial performance
Fullerton, R. R., McWatters, C. S., & Fawson, C. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(03)00002-0 · Cited by 422
Lean implementation within SMEs: a literature review
Hu, Q., Mason, R., Williams, S. J., & Found, P. (2015) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-02-2014-0013 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Voss, C. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066884092
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443579510083587
- The paper
- Voss, C. A. (1995). Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
