The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory
Open accessAbstract
Is there a way to avoid trading off one capability for another in manufacturing? The prevailing wisdom says no. But some manufacturers seem to have been able to defy that: compared to their competitors, they have better quality, are more dependable, respond faster to changing market conditions and in spite of all that, achieve lower costs. How can this be explained? Our aim here is to provide an explanation. We contend that the nature of the trade‐offs among manufacturing capabilities is more complex than has been assumed. Depending on the approach taken for developing each capability, the nature of the trade‐offs change. In certain cases not only can trade‐offs be avoided altogether, but in fact one capability would enhance another. They become cumulative. Moreover, when a capability is developed in this way, it is likely to be more lasting and less fragile than if it were developed at the expense of other capabilities. We go on to suggest a model which shows how this can be done: To build cumulative and lasting manufacturing capability, management attention and resources should go first toward enhancing quality, then—while the efforts to enhance quality are further expanded—attention should be paid to improve also the dependability of the production system, then—and again while efforts on the previous two are further enhanced—production flexibility (or reaction speed) should also be improved, and finally, while all these efforts are further enlarged, direct attention can be paid to cost efficiency. We use data from 1988 European Manufacturing Futures Survey (167 respondents) to test and illustrate our model. While we cannot “prove” our model, nevertheless, we believe there is enough evidence for a critical reexamination of traditional managerial approaches for improving manufacturing performance. For example, except for the cases when there are obvious slacks in the production system, the belief that costs can come down quickly and lastingly needs to be questioned. Lasting cost efficiency in production can be achieved only through improvements in other capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES ON MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE.
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256982 · Cited by 1,312
Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy
Ward, P. T., & Duray, R. (2000) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(99)00021-2 · Cited by 658
Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective
Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.001 · Cited by 612
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy
Voss, C. A. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083587 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferdows, K., & De Meyer, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-184
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2114663259
- Cited by
- 1,230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-t
- The paper
- Ferdows, K., & De Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.