The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The balanced scorecard: a new challenge
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to focus on one strategy known as “The Balanced Scorecard”, discussing the growing importance of balanced scorecard performance systems, exploring issues that organizations face in building and implementing scorecard systems, and sharing lessons learned from Australian organizations that have taken the balanced scorecard journey. Design/methodology/approach: The approach taken is the case study methodology to depict the real world examples of organisations that have confidence in the “Balanced scorecard performance system“ so that other organisations can follow suit. Findings: The paper concludes that the balanced scorecard approach may require some substantial changes in culture within the organization.. The balanced scorecard requires understanding, commitment and support from the very top of the business down. The balanced scorecard will evolve. As culture changes and develops to accept the new approach and members of the organisation mature within the new culture, the organisation will find new things to measure, new goals in different areas, to make the balanced scorecard even more balanced and effective in supporting a living, growing, viable organisation. Different organisations have quite different needs, market areas, people, products and services, and will end up with significantly different balanced scorecards. Research limitations/implications: The outcomes were based on two multinational corporations and may differ with small and medium enterprises. Practical implications: The balanced scorecard is balanced in another dimension – not just a balance of measures of essential areas of the business, but also a balance of goals versus accountability. If people do not accept accountability for achievement of the balanced measures and goals of the balanced scorecard, there is no balanced scorecard. The people of the organisation are the key to the success of the balanced scorecard system. Originality/value: The paper specifically looks at the implementation of the “Balanced Score Card Performance Management System” in Australian corporations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The practice of the Balanced Scorecard in health care services
Kollberg, B., & Elg, M. (2011) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/17410401111140374 · Cited by 70
Khalid, S. K., Beattie, C., & Sands, J. S. (2022) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-09-2020-0325 · Cited by 11
Khan, N. T., Aslam, J., Rauf, A. A., & Kim, Y. B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14063468 · Cited by 8
M. Passonneau, S. (2013) · Performance Measurement and Metrics · doi:10.1108/pmm-05-2013-0015 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Chavan, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Development
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-05-22
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 393-406
- ISSN
- 0262-1711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049889968
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The balanced scorecard: a new challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02621710910955930
- The paper
- Chavan, M. (2009). The balanced scorecard: a new challenge. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710910955930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.