The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of gender on customer loyalty: a relationship marketing approach
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the role of gender in the association of relationship marketing underpinnings (namely trust, commitment, communication, and conflict handling) with customer loyalty. Design/methodology/approach - Data for the research were collected through a survey of customers of banks in Malaysia. Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis (HMRA) was used to estimate the moderation effect of gender in the RM-customer loyalty relationship. Findings - The results show that the four underpinnings of relationship marketing are directly associated with customer loyalty. Significant gender difference exists in the trust-loyalty relationship. Women are significantly more loyal than men at higher levels of trust in the bank. Gender does not moderate the relationship between commitment, communication, conflict handling and loyalty. Research limitations/implications - The research focuses on banking services; further research in other sectors may be necessary before generalization can be made on the entire service industry. In this study, gender plays an important role in customer loyalty. Female customers tend to be more loyal than male customers when the bank is highly trustworthy. Practical implications - Banks should increasingly demonstrate that they are trustworthy in order to keep customers loyal, more so female customers. They should also be committed to service, communicate effectively and handle conflicts well. Originality/value - Although there are studies on relationship marketing and customer loyalty, research on gender roles is very limited. By contributing to the body of knowledge in this area, this research adds significant value. Moreover, the study presents valuable information on the market behaviour of customers in Malaysia, which may be unfamiliar to many readers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400306 · Cited by 4,763
An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.
Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686 · Cited by 1,067
Iacobucci, D., & Ostrom, A. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1057-7408(08)80017-4 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Oly Ndubisi, N.
- Venue
- Marketing Intelligence & Planning
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-61
- ISSN
- 0263-4503 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011497202
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of gender on customer loyalty: a relationship marketing approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02634500610641552
- The paper
- Oly Ndubisi, N. (2006). Effect of gender on customer loyalty: a relationship marketing approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610641552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.