Cited by 2,914Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction

Churchill, Gilbert A., Surprenant, Carol·1982·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr., Carol Surprenant, An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, Special Issue on Causal Modeling (Nov., 1982), pp. 491-504

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3151722

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An outcome better than expected results in positive disconfirmation, leading to satisfaction.

    “An outcome of the evaluation that is poorer than prior expectations results in a negative disconfirmation of expectations, which leads to dissatisfaction, whereas an outcome that is better than expected results in a positive disconfirmation of expectations leading to satisfaction.Confirmation occurs when performance matches expectations and does not lead to a change in satisfaction.”
  • Confirmation occurs when performance matches expectations and does not lead to a change in satisfaction.

    “An outcome of the evaluation that is poorer than prior expectations results in a negative disconfirmation of expectations, which leads to dissatisfaction, whereas an outcome that is better than expected results in a positive disconfirmation of expectations leading to satisfaction.Confirmation occurs when performance matches expectations and does not lead to a change in satisfaction.”
  • An outcome poorer than prior expectations results in negative disconfirmation, which leads to dissatisfaction.

    “An outcome of the evaluation that is poorer than prior expectations results in a negative disconfirmation of expectations, which leads to dissatisfaction, whereas an outcome that is better than expected results in a positive disconfirmation of expectations leading to satisfaction.Confirmation occurs when performance matches expectations and does not lead to a change in satisfaction.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1982-11
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
491
ISSN
0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2333954233
Cited by
2,914
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 196 · 2014: 186 · 2013: 176 · 2012: 173
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
customer satisfaction, determinants of satisfaction, causal models, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review