The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze a series of strategic capabilities/factors that affects organizational innovation (OI) and organizational learning (OL) (personal mastery, transformational leadership, shared vision, proactivity and environment) and demonstrate that OL and innovation are positively related to organizational performance. Design/methodology/approach: Based on prior research, the paper develops a number of testable hypotheses. It examines how personal mastery, transformational leadership, shared vision, proactivity and environment influence improvements in performance. The paper uses inter‐factor correlations matrix and multiple regressions analyses and empirically tests these hypotheses using a sample of 408 Spanish organizations. Findings: Considers OI and OL jointly to promote organizational entrepreneurship and to increase competitive advantages. Empirically reflects the need to strengthen different strategic capabilities to achieve an adequate level of both organizational issues and thus improve performance and encourage entrepreneurship. Research limitations/implications: Survey data based on self‐reports may be subject to social desirability bias. The external validation of some of the variables from the archival data of a subset of respondents increased confidence in self‐reports and reduced the risk of common method variance. The paper needs to concentrate on other sectors. Future studies should place greater emphasis on longitudinal studies and should be based on a larger sample, preferably in more than one country. It would be interesting to analyze other strategic activities for entrepreneurship. Practical implications: Organizations' managers must encourage the organization's members to achieve high levels of personal mastery. This environment can be provided by continually encouraging personal vision. The style of management must be more transformational. They must foster shared vision. The leader must prepare the organization and shape the mental models. Specific actions must be taken to overcome the internal and external obstacles to shared vision. The leader will play an important role in linking the organization and the environment and generate proactivity. Originality/value: This paper is fundamental to promote strategy capabilities that are necessary to entrepreneurship (OL and OI).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · Cited by 6,447
Senge, P. M. (1990) · Cited by 6,332
DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256701 · Cited by 6,068
SOCIAL CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION: THE ROLE OF INTRAFIRM NETWORKS.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257085 · Cited by 5,925
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Market Orientation and the Learning Organization
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299505900306 · Cited by 4,366
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200303 · Cited by 3,971
Cited by
Rhee, J., Park, T., & Lee, D. H. (2010) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.008 · Cited by 710
System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation
Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C.-C. (2010) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.109 · Cited by 375
Bartram, T., & Casimir, G. (2007) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730710718218 · Cited by 269
Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective
Wang, J.-C., & Chiang, M.-J. (2009) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.013 · Cited by 133
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042079 · Cited by 99
“(2008) [46] examined the relationship between organizational learning and organizational innovation and outlined that the former has a significant effect on the latter.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- García‐Morales, V. J., Llorens‐Montes, F. J., & Verdú‐Jover, A. J.
- Venue
- Industrial Management & Data Systems
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029435293
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 26.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02635570610642940
- The paper
- García‐Morales, V. J., Llorens‐Montes, F. J., & Verdú‐Jover, A. J. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610642940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.