The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate the influence of different factors on knowledge donation and collection. The examined factors are among those determinants which comprise different aspects of knowledge sharing behaviour in an organisational context. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the widely accepted theory of planned behaviour (TPB), we tried to develop a comprehensive model. The model covered different individual and organisational factors. Responses to a total of 502 questionnaires were considered. Structural equation modelling was then used to test the research model and hypotheses. Findings: This research evaluated the influence of a series of potential factors on knowledge sharing behaviour. While perceived self‐efficacy and anticipated reciprocal relationships had a positive impact on attitude toward knowledge sharing, expected extrinsic rewards did not show a significant relationship with this variable. Organisational climate had a positive impact on subjective norms about knowledge sharing. In addition, the level of information and communication technology usage reflected a positive effect on knowledge sharing behaviour. Finally, significant relationships were found between the TPB elements. Originality/value: This paper has tried to provide a comprehensive understanding about knowledge sharing facilitators in the oil industry. Since there was a lack of such research in an Iranian context, this paper can provide theoretical basis for future researches as well as practical implications for managers and practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 2×
“Nonaka recognizes knowledge as a multidimensional concept (Nonaka, 1994); likewise Davenport and Prusak (1998) recognize knowledge as something deeper and richer than data or information.”
BackgroundThe Knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation
(1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(97)80234-x · Cited by 13,156
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250961 · Cited by 10,176
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
The Social Psychology of Groups
Kenkel, W. F., Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709294 · Cited by 5,898
Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings.
Rutherford, G. S. W., Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1988) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348783 · Cited by 5,830
The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1996) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3 · Cited by 5,774
Cited by
Kim, T. T., & Lee, G. (2013) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.009 · Cited by 338
The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education
Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Tohidinia, Z., & Mosakhani, M.
- Venue
- Industrial Management & Data Systems
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-04-27
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611-631
- ISSN
- 0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011728184
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 49.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02635571011039052
- The paper
- Tohidinia, Z., & Mosakhani, M. (2010). Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011039052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.