Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factorial and discriminant analyses of the underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction

Oly Ndubisi, Nelson, Kok Wah, Chan·2005·International Journal of Bank Marketing

Abstract

Purpose: This research seeks to empirically evaluate the influence of the underpinnings of relationship marketing on the perceived quality of bank‐customer relationship, and on customer satisfaction in the Malaysian banking sector. Design/methodology/approach: A field survey of bank customers in Malaysia was conducted using a questionnaire. The data were factor‐analysed to determine the key dimensions of RM. The resulting dimensions were applied in the subsequent discriminant analyses conducted to determine which factors discriminate between customers on the basis of perceived bank‐customer relationship quality and customer satisfaction. Findings: The results show that five key dimensions, namely: competence, communication, conflict handling, trust, and relationship quality, discriminate between customers in terms of perceived relationship quality and customer satisfaction. Moreover, overall bank‐customer relationship quality discriminates between satisfied customers and those who are not. Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in a bank setting, and may not be generalised in other industries. It has also not considered the impact of the relationship management underpinnings on customer loyalty. However, by employing these constructs, and replicating this study in other industries, researchers would be able to unveil the factors that discriminate between loyal customers and those who are not, and also produce more generic results. Practical implications: Findings suggest that banks can create customer satisfaction by exhibiting trustworthy behaviour, showing genuine commitment to service, communicating information to customers efficiently and accurately, delivering services competently, handling potential and manifest conflicts skilfully, and improving overall customer relationship quality. Originality/value: Interest in the subjects of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction has been growing among marketing researchers and practitioners. This study adds value by unveiling the key antecedents of relationship quality and customer satisfaction (using the relationship management approach) that can be used in customer relationship management. Customer relationship management itself enables organisations to leverage on privileged information gained through closeness to customers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02652320510629908

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Berry, L.L. (1983), “Relationship marketing”, in Berry, L.L., Shostack, G.L. and Upah, G.D. (Eds), Emerging Perspectives of Services Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 25‐8.
  2. Calonius, H. (1988), “A buying process model”, Proceedings of the XVII Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy on Innovative Marketing – A European Perspective, University of Bradford, pp. 86‐103.
  3. Carlson, L., Grossbart, S. and Tripp, C. (1990), “An investigation of mothers' communication orientation and patterns”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 840‐72.
  4. Chan, K.W. (2004), “Examining the antecedents of relationship quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty”, unpublished MBA thesis, University of Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.
  5. Jackson, B.B. (1985), “Building customer relationships that last”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63 No. 6, pp. 120‐8.
  6. Johnson, J.L. (1999), “Relationship quality in business‐to‐business service context”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 45‐67.
  7. Kiesler, C.A. (1971), The Psychology of Commitment, Academic Press, New York, NY.
  8. Marketing Week (2001), “The customer is often ignored”, Marketing Week, Vol. 27, p. 3.
  9. Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R. and Zaltman, G. (1993), Relationship between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Role of Personal Trust, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
  10. Ndubisi, N.O. (2003), “Service quality: understanding customer perception and reaction, and its impact on business”, International Journal of Business, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 207‐19. · doi:10.22146/gamaijb.5407
  11. Ndubisi, N.O. and Chan, K.W. (2004), “Relationship marketing keystones and impacts on relationship quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty”, Proceedings of AIMS International Conference on Management, India, December 28‐31, pp. 562‐9.
  12. Raddon, G.H. (1987), “Quality service – a low cost profit strategy”, Bank Marketing, September, pp. 10‐12.

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Oly Ndubisi, N., & Kok Wah, C.
Venue
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
542-557
ISSN
0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997818371
Cited by
332
References
52
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factorial and discriminant analyses of the underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02652320510629908
The paper
Oly Ndubisi, N., & Kok Wah, C. (2005). Factorial and discriminant analyses of the underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320510629908

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.