The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factorial and discriminant analyses of the underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction
Abstract
Purpose: This research seeks to empirically evaluate the influence of the underpinnings of relationship marketing on the perceived quality of bank‐customer relationship, and on customer satisfaction in the Malaysian banking sector. Design/methodology/approach: A field survey of bank customers in Malaysia was conducted using a questionnaire. The data were factor‐analysed to determine the key dimensions of RM. The resulting dimensions were applied in the subsequent discriminant analyses conducted to determine which factors discriminate between customers on the basis of perceived bank‐customer relationship quality and customer satisfaction. Findings: The results show that five key dimensions, namely: competence, communication, conflict handling, trust, and relationship quality, discriminate between customers in terms of perceived relationship quality and customer satisfaction. Moreover, overall bank‐customer relationship quality discriminates between satisfied customers and those who are not. Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in a bank setting, and may not be generalised in other industries. It has also not considered the impact of the relationship management underpinnings on customer loyalty. However, by employing these constructs, and replicating this study in other industries, researchers would be able to unveil the factors that discriminate between loyal customers and those who are not, and also produce more generic results. Practical implications: Findings suggest that banks can create customer satisfaction by exhibiting trustworthy behaviour, showing genuine commitment to service, communicating information to customers efficiently and accurately, delivering services competently, handling potential and manifest conflicts skilfully, and improving overall customer relationship quality. Originality/value: Interest in the subjects of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction has been growing among marketing researchers and practitioners. This study adds value by unveiling the key antecedents of relationship quality and customer satisfaction (using the relationship management approach) that can be used in customer relationship management. Customer relationship management itself enables organisations to leverage on privileged information gained through closeness to customers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.
Tullock, G., & Hirschman, A. O. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325604 · Cited by 10,904
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
The measurement of organizational commitment
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1 · Cited by 8,752
A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400103 · Cited by 5,826
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
Zero defections: quality comes to services.
Reichheld, F. F., & Sasser, W. E. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 5,373
Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400306 · Cited by 4,763
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Berry, L.L. (1983), “Relationship marketing”, in Berry, L.L., Shostack, G.L. and Upah, G.D. (Eds), Emerging Perspectives of Services Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 25‐8.
- Calonius, H. (1988), “A buying process model”, Proceedings of the XVII Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy on Innovative Marketing – A European Perspective, University of Bradford, pp. 86‐103.
- Carlson, L., Grossbart, S. and Tripp, C. (1990), “An investigation of mothers' communication orientation and patterns”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 840‐72.
- Chan, K.W. (2004), “Examining the antecedents of relationship quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty”, unpublished MBA thesis, University of Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.
- Jackson, B.B. (1985), “Building customer relationships that last”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63 No. 6, pp. 120‐8.
- Johnson, J.L. (1999), “Relationship quality in business‐to‐business service context”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 45‐67.
- Kiesler, C.A. (1971), The Psychology of Commitment, Academic Press, New York, NY.
- Marketing Week (2001), “The customer is often ignored”, Marketing Week, Vol. 27, p. 3.
- Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R. and Zaltman, G. (1993), Relationship between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Role of Personal Trust, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
- Ndubisi, N.O. (2003), “Service quality: understanding customer perception and reaction, and its impact on business”, International Journal of Business, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 207‐19. · doi:10.22146/gamaijb.5407
- Ndubisi, N.O. and Chan, K.W. (2004), “Relationship marketing keystones and impacts on relationship quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty”, Proceedings of AIMS International Conference on Management, India, December 28‐31, pp. 562‐9.
- Raddon, G.H. (1987), “Quality service – a low cost profit strategy”, Bank Marketing, September, pp. 10‐12.
Cited by
Ganguli, S., & Roy, S. K. (2011) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321111107648 · Cited by 357
Customer satisfaction, loyalty and commitment in service organizations: Some evidence from Greece
Dimitriades, Z. S. (2006) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/01409170610717817 · Cited by 332
The Antecedents of Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation in Life Insurance Context
Banaras Hindu University, F. O. M. S., Alok, K. R., & Srivastava, M. (2013) · Journal of Competitiveness · doi:10.7441/joc.2013.02.10 · Cited by 141
“Ndubisi and Chan (2005) suggested that in context of relationship marketing, communication involves rendering trustworthy information , fulfilling promises and informing in case of delivery related problems.”
BackgroundMoghavvemi, S., Lee, S. T., & Lee, S. P. (2018) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-06-2017-0114 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Oly Ndubisi, N., & Kok Wah, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 542-557
- ISSN
- 0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997818371
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factorial and discriminant analyses of the underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02652320510629908
- The paper
- Oly Ndubisi, N., & Kok Wah, C. (2005). Factorial and discriminant analyses of the underpinnings of relationship marketing and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320510629908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.