Cited by 204Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyBanking Sector Performance and ManagementConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Bank service quality: comparing Canadian and Tunisian customer perceptions

Ladhari, Riadh, Ladhari, Ines, Morales, Miguel·2011·International Journal of Bank Marketing

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to compare perceptions of bank service quality among Tunisian and Canadian customers, and to determine which dimensions of service quality make the greatest contribution to overall customer satisfaction and loyalty. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected using self‐administered questionnaires from two convenience samples of bank customers (250 in Canada and 222 in Tunisia). Service quality was measured using the five SERVQUAL dimensions of tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, ANOVA and linear regression. Findings: Respondents in both countries reported high levels of perceived service quality in banks. However, Canadians reported higher perceived service quality than Tunisians for all five SERVQUAL dimensions, and for 21 of the 22 individual items. In the Canadian sample, empathy and reliability were found to be the most important predictors of satisfaction and loyalty, while in the Tunisian sample, reliability and responsiveness were the most important predictors of satisfaction and loyalty. Practical implications: Canadian bank managers should recognize the importance of “empathy” in service delivery by implementing appropriate customer‐oriented strategies. Tunisian bank managers should focus on performing promised services dependably and accurately. Originality/value: Despite the large number of studies on individual countries, few studies compare bank service quality among different countries. The present study compares perceptions of bank service quality between consumers in two countries – Canada and Tunisia – that have different economic and cultural environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02652321111117502

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SERVQUAL is criticized specifically with regard to its reliability and validity, the use of different scores and the stability of its factor structure.

    “Despite its widespread use, SERVQUAL is being criticized specifically with regard to its reliability and validity, the use of different scores and the stability of its factor structure (Ladhari et al., 2011;Njau, 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ladhari, R., Ladhari, I., & Morales, M.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • University of Sousse (TN)
  • Saint Mary's University (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-04-12
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
224-246
ISSN
0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081291883
Cited by
204
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
FWCI
24.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Bank Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Banking Sector Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
bank service quality, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, SERVQUAL, cross-cultural comparison, reliability, empathy, responsiveness, assurance, tangibles, banking services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review