Bank service quality: comparing Canadian and Tunisian customer perceptions
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to compare perceptions of bank service quality among Tunisian and Canadian customers, and to determine which dimensions of service quality make the greatest contribution to overall customer satisfaction and loyalty. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected using self‐administered questionnaires from two convenience samples of bank customers (250 in Canada and 222 in Tunisia). Service quality was measured using the five SERVQUAL dimensions of tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, ANOVA and linear regression. Findings: Respondents in both countries reported high levels of perceived service quality in banks. However, Canadians reported higher perceived service quality than Tunisians for all five SERVQUAL dimensions, and for 21 of the 22 individual items. In the Canadian sample, empathy and reliability were found to be the most important predictors of satisfaction and loyalty, while in the Tunisian sample, reliability and responsiveness were the most important predictors of satisfaction and loyalty. Practical implications: Canadian bank managers should recognize the importance of “empathy” in service delivery by implementing appropriate customer‐oriented strategies. Tunisian bank managers should focus on performing promised services dependably and accurately. Originality/value: Despite the large number of studies on individual countries, few studies compare bank service quality among different countries. The present study compares perceptions of bank service quality between consumers in two countries – Canada and Tunisia – that have different economic and cultural environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SERVQUAL is criticized specifically with regard to its reliability and validity, the use of different scores and the stability of its factor structure.
“Despite its widespread use, SERVQUAL is being criticized specifically with regard to its reliability and validity, the use of different scores and the stability of its factor structure (Ladhari et al., 2011;Njau, 2019).”
From Service quality of Islamic banks: satisfaction, loyalty and the mediating role of trust (2020) · cites this paper as Ladhari et al., 2011
Cites
Bloemer, J., de Ruyter, K., & Peeters, P. (1998) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652329810245984 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Nguyen, N., & LeBlanc, G. (1998) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652329810206707 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Antecedents of Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation in Life Insurance Context
Banaras Hindu University, F. O. M. S., Alok, K. R., & Srivastava, M. (2013) · Journal of Competitiveness · doi:10.7441/joc.2013.02.10 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“Ladhari et al. (2011) conceptualized loyalty as a customer's continued patronage of a particular bank.”
BackgroundService quality of Islamic banks: satisfaction, loyalty and the mediating role of trust
Haron, R., Abdul Subar, N., & Ibrahim, K. (2020) · Islamic Economic Studies · doi:10.1108/ies-12-2019-0041 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ladhari, R., Ladhari, I., & Morales, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- University of Sousse (TN)
- Saint Mary's University (CA)
- ORCID
- Ladhari, Riadh
- Venue
- International Journal of Bank Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 224-246
- ISSN
- 0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081291883
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 24.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Bank Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Banking Sector Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- bank service quality, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty, SERVQUAL, cross-cultural comparison, reliability, empathy, responsiveness, assurance, tangibles, banking services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review