The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace?
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to examine whether personality and motivational driver differences exist across three generations of working Australians: Baby Boomers, Gen Xs, and Gen Ys. Design/methodology/approach: Using the Occupational Personality Questionnaire and the Motivation Questionnaire, the study examined cross‐sectional differences in personality and motivational drivers across three generations. Findings: The results are not supportive of the generational stereotypes that have been pervasive in the management literature and the media. Specifically, few meaningful differences were found between the three generations. Moreover, even when differences have been observed, these have related more to age than generation. Research limitations/implications: One of the key limitations is the use of cross‐sectional data. To further explore this issue, it would be interesting to undertake a longitudinal study to assess personality preferences and motivational drivers of the different generations, when the participants are at the same age or the same point in their career. Practical implications: The research emphasizes the importance of managing individuals by focusing on individual differences rather than relying on generational stereotypes, which may not be as prevalent as the existing literature suggests. Originality/value: Managers and HR professionals may find the lack of differences across generations interesting and refreshing, in contrast with the popular management literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millennium
Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.147 · Cited by 1,657
Cited by
A Review of the Empirical Evidence on Generational Differences in Work Attitudes
Twenge, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9165-6 · Cited by 946
Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence
Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x · Cited by 879
Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4 · Cited by 623
Generational Differences in Work Ethic: Fact or Fiction?
Zabel, K. L., Biermeier-Hanson, B. B. J., Baltes, B. B., Early, B. J., & Shepard, A. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9466-5 · Cited by 101
Gong, B., Greenwood, R. A., Hoyte, D., Ramkissoon, A., & He, X. (2018) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-05-2016-0121 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Managerial Psychology
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-11-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 878-890
- ISSN
- 0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1569667623
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02683940810904376
- The paper
- Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.