The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and its relation to institutional ownership (IO) of Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs). Design/methodology/approach: Testing of hypotheses have been conducted by applying multivariate regression techniques utilizing longitudinal data analysis of companies' annual reports. Two well‐established models, the fixed effects model and random effects model are conducted in this paper. Findings: Results which confirmed earlier estimations indicated that there are positive and significant relationships between CSR disclosure (CSRD) and IO. This result suggests that Malaysian PLCs are able to attract and maintain their institutional investors while they engage in social activities. Practical implications: Companies should be encouraged to be involved in CSR activities as one of their strategies in attracting investment as well as to improve their reputation and image. Originality/value: Most studies on CSRD in Malaysia pertain to the analysis of such reporting and motivations of managers towards CSRD. This paper conducts a comprehensive empirical research on the relationship between CSRD and IO in Malaysian PLCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS TO PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES.
TURBAN, D. B., & GREENING, D. W. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257057 · Cited by 3,149
Cited by
ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 · Cited by 1,611
Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1410 · Cited by 930
What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review
Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-08-2014-0050 · Cited by 441
Corporate social responsibility disclosures over time: evidence from Malaysia
Ahmed Haji, A. (2013) · Managerial Auditing Journal · doi:10.1108/maj-07-2012-0729 · Cited by 306
García‐Sánchez, I., Rodríguez‐Ariza, L., Aibar‐Guzmán, B., & Aibar‐Guzmán, C. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2485 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R.
- Venue
- Managerial Auditing Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-06-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 591-613
- ISSN
- 0268-6902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1578426533
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02686901011054881
- The paper
- Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011054881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.