Cited by 1,611Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Governance and Financial ManagementCorporate Identity and Reputation

ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure

Fatemi, Ali, Glaum, Martin, Kaiser, Stefanie·2018·Global Finance Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management (DE)
Corresponding author
Fatemi, Ali
Venue
Global Finance Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
38
Pages
45-64
ISSN
1044-0283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593151889
Cited by
1,611
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 328 · 2025: 359 · 2024: 300 · 2023: 242 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
FWCI
54.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Finance Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
Keywords
ESG performance, firm value, ESG disclosure, corporate sustainability, stock valuation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review