The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing ‐ Seeing through the fog
Abstract
Outlines 15 explanations for the fog which has enveloped the nascent domains of corporate identity and corporate marketing. However, the fog surrounding the area has a silver lining. This is because the fog has, unwittingly, led to the emergence of rich disciplinary, philosophical as well as “national”, schools of thought. In their composite, these approaches have the potential to form the foundations of a new approach to management which might be termed “corporate marketing”. In addition to articulating the author’s understanding of the attributes regarding a business identity (the umbrella label used to cover corporate identity, organisational identification and visual identity) the author outlines the characteristics of corporate marketing and introduces a new corporate marketing mix based on the mnemonic “HEADS”[2]. This relates to what an organisation has, expresses, the affinities of its employees, as well as what the organisation does and how it is seen by stakeholder groups and networks. In addition, the author describes the relationship between the corporate identity and corporate brand and notes the differences between product brands and corporate brands. Finally, the author argues that scholars need to be sensitive to the factors that are contributing to the fog surrounding corporate identity. Only then will business identity/corporate marketing studies grow in maturity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future
Thøger Christensen, L., & Cornelissen, J. (2011) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318910390194 · Cited by 250
Reputation building: beyond our control? Inferences in consumers' ethical perception formation
Brunk, K. H. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.317 · Cited by 79
Ideological rationality and violence: An exploratory study of ISIL’s cyber profile
Derrick, D. C., Sporer, K., Church, S., & Scott Ligon, G. (2016) · Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict · doi:10.1080/17467586.2016.1267866 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Balmer, J. M. T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3/4
- Pages
- 248-291
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037955438
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.