The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping consumer power: an integrative framework for marketing and consumer research
Abstract
Purpose: To help shape a more cohesive research program in marketing and consumer research, this paper presents a systematic effort to integrate current research on consumer empowerment with highly influential theories of power. A conceptual overview of power consisting of three dominant theoretical models is developed onto which is mapped existing consumer empowerment research. Design/methodology/approach: A synthetic review focuses on three perspectives of consumer power: consumer sovereignty, cultural power and discursive power, drawing from sociological, philosophical and economic literature. These models are then applied to consumer research to illuminate research applications and insights. Findings: Research of consumer empowerment has grown significantly over the last decade. Yet, researchers drawing from a variety of intellectual and methodological traditions have generated a multitude of heuristic simplifications and mid‐level theories of power to inform their empirical and conceptual explorations. This review helps clarify consumer empowerment, and offers a useful map for future research. Research limitations/implications: Researchers in consumer empowerment need to understand the historical development of power, and to contextualize research within conflicting perspectives on empowerment. Originality/value: The paper makes several contributions: organizes a currently cluttered field of consumer empowerment research, connects consumer and marketing research to high‐level theorizations of power, and outlines specific avenues for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Mirrors of Masculinity: Representation and Identity in Advertising Images
Schroeder, J. E., & Zwick, D. (2004) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/1025386042000212383 · Cited by 383
Self-citationLudic Agency and Retail Spectacle
Kozinets, R. V., Sherry, Jr., Storm, D., Duhachek, A., Nuttavuthisit, K., & DeBerry‐Spence, B. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/425101 · Cited by 360
Equity and repurchase intention following service failure
Palmer, A., Beggs, R., & Keown‐McMullan, C. (2000) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040010347624 · Cited by 218 · cited 1×
“For example, obvious moments of conflict between an individual consumer and seller would be evidenced anytime during and after an exchange and these can be studied by drawing from service and relationship marketing where critical incidents have received substantial attention (Keaveney, 1995; Hoffman and Bateson, 1997;…”
Background
Cited by
Airoldi, M., & Rokka, J. (2022) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726 · Cited by 111
Frank, D., & Otterbring, T. (2024) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12780 · Cited by 49
Harris, J., Anderson, M., Clément, C., & Nisbett, N. (2019) · IDS Bulletin · doi:10.19088/1968-2019.112 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Denegri‐Knott, J., Zwick, D., & Schroeder, J. E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9/10
- Pages
- 950-971
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964939324
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 26.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping consumer power: an integrative framework for marketing and consumer research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560610680952
- The paper
- Denegri‐Knott, J., Zwick, D., & Schroeder, J. E. (2006). Mapping consumer power: an integrative framework for marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610680952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.