Cited by 14,779Service and Product InnovationCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyMarketing and Advertising Strategies

Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing

Vargo, Stephen L., Lusch, Robert F.·2004·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Marketing inherited a model of exchange from economics, which had a dominant logic based on the exchange of “goods,” which usually are manufactured output. The dominant logic focused on tangible resources, embedded value, and transactions. Over the past several decades, new perspectives have emerged that have a revised logic focused on intangible resources, the cocreation of value, and relationships. The authors believe that the new perspectives are converging to form a new dominant logic for marketing, one in which service provision rather than goods is fundamental to economic exchange. The authors explore this evolving logic and the corresponding shift in perspective for marketing scholars, marketing practitioners, and marketing educators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Service-Dominant logic offers a meaningful theoretical framework to address the co-creation of value for all in the context of the smart tourism destination.

    “Service-Dominant logic (S-D logic) offers a meaningful theoretical framework to address the co-creation of value for all in the context of the smart tourism destination (Vargo and Lusch, 2004).”

    From Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness (2016) · cites this paper as Vargo and Lusch, 2004

  • Value is co-created by the firm and its customers.

    “Vargo and Lusch (2004) introduced the service-dominant (SD) logic, arguing that value is co-created by the firm and its customers.”

    From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Vargo and Lusch 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F.
Affiliations
  • School of Business, University of Maryland
  • Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vargo, Stephen L.
  • Lusch, Robert F.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2004-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2135526934
Cited by
14,779
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 695 · 2025: 640 · 2024: 650 · 2023: 674 · 2022: 765 · 2021: 903 · 2020: 920 · 2019: 891 · 2018: 913 · 2017: 842 · 2016: 930 · 2015: 970 · 2014: 932 · 2013: 837 · 2012: 808
FWCI
304.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
Keywords
dominant logic, marketing theory, intangible resources, value co-creation, customer relationships, service delivery, goods versus services, economic exchange, marketing education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review