The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations
Abstract
Purpose - Several trends such as improved access to health care information via the internet, the growth of self-help groups and expenditure on alternative medicine signals consumers are taking an active role in their own health management. Chronic illnesses such as diabetes and asthma require a significant amount of self-management and thus call for a collaborative patient-physician relationship. This study explores whether empowering patient-physician consultations measured through three patient empowerment dimensions (patient control, patient participation, physician support) enhance patients trust in and commitment to their physician.Design/methodology/approach - A comprehensive mail survey of adults registered with one of four different chronic illness associations in Australia was conducted to collect the data.Findings - The structural equation modelling results show that patients are more trusting of and committed to physicians who adopt an empowering communication style with them.Research limitations/implications - This study focuses on the Australian healthcare context. Thus, future multinational studies should explore suitable strategies to empower healthcare consumers that build on the constraints placed by diverse healthcare systems.Practical implications - In a managed health care and cost cutting climate where patient trust is deteriorating, these findings suggest that empowering patients presents a means to improve the patient-physician relationship.Originality/value - Whilst numerous marketing scholars have researched the empowerment of staff, there is a shortage of studies that address the meaning and outcomes of consumer empowerment. This study proposes a unique communication based consumer empowerment construct which is shown to impact on consumer-service provider relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness
Mechanic, D., & Meyer, S. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00014-9 · Cited by 617
Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm
Anderson, R. M., & Funnell, M. M. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.008 · Cited by 551
Cited by
Chan, K. W., Yim, C. K. (., & Lam, S. S. K. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.3.048 · Cited by 1,081
Sweeney, J. C., Danaher, T. S., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515572128 · Cited by 442
Self-citationPerceived Service Quality and Customer Trust: Does Enhancing Customers' Service Knowledge Matter?
Eisingerich, A. B., & Bell, S. J. (2008) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670507310769 · Cited by 267
Dabholkar, P. A., & Sheng, X. (2012) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.624596 · Cited by 256
Bhat, S. A., & Darzi, M. A. (2016) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-11-2014-0160 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J., & Johnson, L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9/10
- Pages
- 1068-1086
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015238944
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560610681014
- The paper
- Ouschan, R., Sweeney, J., & Johnson, L. (2006). Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610681014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.