The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer adoption of technological innovations: Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation
Abstract
Purpose: This study seeks to investigate barriers in the consumer adoption process of technological innovations under different contingencies. The paper aims to focus on barriers impeding adoption of technologies characterized by high incompatibility and high uncertainty – i.e. a “lack of content” (LoC) situation – versus technologies characterized by low incompatibility and low uncertainty – i.e. a “presence of content” (PoC) situation. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a literature study, the paper develops hypotheses that distinguish the diverging effects of both psychological and functional barriers on consumer adoption in different situations (LoC versus PoC). Data were collected by means of a survey, resulting in an effective sample of 229 respondents. Findings: In the case of LoC, the value, risk (financial and performance) and image barrier are negatively related to adoption intention, where the latter barrier is significantly stronger for the LoC situation than for the PoC situation. For PoC, it is found that the value, image, and financial risk barriers are negatively related to adoption intention, where the value barrier outweighs all other barriers. Interestingly, the traditional barrier reveals a positive effect on adoption intention. Practical implications: The results suggest that managers and retailers should develop a more sophisticated understanding of consumers' adoption intention of new technologies. Distinguishing between LoC and PoC situations offers managers the opportunity to differentiate their communication strategies and design more compelling ways for consumers to overcome the specific barriers they perceive in each situation. Originality/value: The paper attempts to offer a more fine‐grained understanding of consumer adoption by investigating the extent to which the lack versus the presence of content gives rise to differences regarding the effects of psychological and functional barriers to technology adoption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis
Green, S. B. (1991) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7 · Cited by 3,916
Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009 · Cited by 2,084
Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302303001 · Cited by 1,898
Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline
Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569310026637 · Cited by 1,348 · cited 1×
“Several risk dimensions have been introduced ( Stone and Gronhaug, 1993”
BackgroundPorter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003 · Cited by 1,066
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650205285368 · Cited by 701
Cited by
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., & Wei, J. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102047 · Cited by 528
An innovation resistance theory perspective on mobile payment solutions
Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Singh, N., Sahu, G., & Almotairi, M. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102059 · Cited by 487
Chang, T.-S., & Hsiao, W.-H. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-12-2023-0551 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Antioco, M., & Kleijnen, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2010-11-16
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11/12
- Pages
- 1700-1724
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1532272291
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer adoption of technological innovations: Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090561011079846
- The paper
- Antioco, M., & Kleijnen, M. (2010). Consumer adoption of technological innovations: Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011079846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.