The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing
Abstract
Qualitative research has not been viewed as a rigorous alternative to established quantitative methods in postgraduate marketing research. However, this paper reports on the Australian development of a successful, structured approach to using the case study methodology in postgraduate research. Its aim is to present and justify guidelines for using the case study research methodology in honours, masters and PhD research theses, and so it should interest candidates and their supervisors. First, appropriate positions on a range of scientific paradigms and core issues of induction and deduction are established. Then implementation of the case study methodology is examined, including the numbers of case studies and of interviews. Unusual but effective uses of theoretical replication to rigorously analyze case study data are illustrated from postgraduate theses. Finally, a framework is provided for constructing a thesis, emphasizing the key methodology chapter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Cited by
Healy, M., & Perry, C. (2000) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750010333861 · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationResearch design and data analysis in realism research
Sobh, R., & Perry, C. (2006) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560610702777 · Cited by 401
Self-citationDigital entrepreneurship: Innovative business models for the sharing economy
Richter, C., Kraus, S., Brem, A., Durst, S., & Giselbrecht, C. (2017) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12227 · Cited by 356
Environmental leadership and consciousness development: A case study among Canadian SMEs
Boiral, O., Baron, C., & Gunnlaugson, O. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1845-5 · Cited by 216
Qualitative research in marketing: what can academics do better?
Crick, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2020.1743738 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Perry, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9/10
- Pages
- 785-802
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076308332
- Cited by
- 996
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090569810232237
- The paper
- Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569810232237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.