The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antecedents of green purchases: a survey in China
Abstract
Examines the influence of cultural values, ecological affect and ecological knowledge on the green purchasing behavior of Chinese consumers. Using structural equation modeling to assess the significance that ecological affect and ecological knowledge have on green purchase intention and actual green purchase, the results demonstrate that a strong positive relationship exists. However, other important findings suggest that Chinese people’s level of ecological knowledge is low and actual green purchase behavior minimal. Yet in contrast, Chinese consumers express a positive ecological affect and green purchase intention. In relation to the hypothesis that the Chinese strongly adhere to the cultural value of living in harmony with nature, the relevant descriptive statistic shows that today’s Chinese only pay moderate allegiance to this “man‐nature” orientation. Moreover, this cultural value is only found to exert significant bearing on ecological affect but not ecological knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · International Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,518
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120 · Cited by 1,463
Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers
Jaiswal, D., & Kant, R. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008 · Cited by 846
Debrah, J. K., Vidal, D. G., & Dinis, M. A. P. (2021) · Recycling · doi:10.3390/recycling6010006 · Cited by 552
“Environmental knowledge is considered as one’s capacity to recognize symbols, concepts, and behavioural patterns related to environmental protection [54,129].”
BackgroundCompany environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions
Grimmer, M., & Bingham, T. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.017 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-357
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095252750
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antecedents of green purchases: a survey in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363760010335358
- The paper
- Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y. (2000). Antecedents of green purchases: a survey in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760010335358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.