The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust‐based commitment: multidimensional consumer‐brand relationships
Abstract
Purpose: To propose and test a multi‐dimensional model of relationship commitment defined by personal and functional connections which are, in turn, driven by trust and satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach: A model is proposed to define relationship constructs better within marketing practice and to evaluate the relationships between these constructs. Structural equation modeling was employed to validate the model using data from two case studies. Findings: Satisfaction is antecedent to trust, but primarily contributes to functional connections. Personal connections, on the other hand, stem from trust. The relative strengths of personal and functional connections determine the nature and outcomes of relationship commitment. This trust‐based model is statistically superior to previous models and explains customer‐brand relationships much more extensively. Research limitations/implications: The primary limitation of this research is that it explores only two product/service categories, potentially limiting the generalizability to other domains. Practical implications: These results have extensive implications for brand building, establishing customer relationships, and incorporating relationships into brand strategies. Originality/value: These results improve our understanding of customers' relationships with brands and provide managers with guidance on developing, nurturing, and utilizing these relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships
Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300205 · Cited by 4,899
Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges
Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449 · Cited by 4,196
Bolton, R. N. (1998) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.45 · Cited by 1,948
Service Failure and Recovery: The Impact of Relationship Factors on Customer Satisfaction
Hess Jr., R. L., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302250898 · Cited by 959
Cited by
The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679170105 · Cited by 1,365
Kamboj, S., Sarmah, B., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.001 · Cited by 591
Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources
Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Islam, R. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.001 · Cited by 587
Lee, J. A., Sudarshan, S., Sussman, K. L., Bright, L. F., & Eastin, M. S. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1964226 · Cited by 265
Hayes, J. L., Brinson, N. H., Bott, G. J., & Moeller, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2021.01.001 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Hess, J., & Story, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 313-322
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976491475
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust‐based commitment: multidimensional consumer‐brand relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363760510623902
- The paper
- Hess, J., & Story, J. (2005). Trust‐based commitment: multidimensional consumer‐brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510623902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.