Cited by 6Educational Assessment and ImprovementYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceEducation Discipline and Inequality

An evaluation of reports on the attendance of pupils in out-of-school provision

Reid, Ken·2007·International Journal of Educational Management

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse and evaluate Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) reports on attendance issues within local education authorities' out‐of‐school provision. Design/methodology/approach A full cohort of Ofsted reports on inspections of out‐of‐school units, often known as pupil referral units (PRUs), undertaken in England in 2003 were scrutinised. The attendance data were then analysed statistically and geographically by region. The regions designated were the north of England, London and the Home Counties, the Midlands and the rest of England. Findings The findings indicate that unauthorised absence rates in PRUs are more than ten times those reported for primary and secondary schools and for local education authorities (LEAs). Overall, unauthorised absence rates exceed authorised rates throughout a majority of PRUs inspected in England in 2003; the exact opposite to schools. There are considerable variations in rates of authorised and unauthorised absence between PRUs within the same regions and within some LEAs. Practical implications Ofsted appear to give more latitude towards attendance issues within PRUs than they do in their inspection reports for schools and LEAs. The implications of these findings are considered along with the need for further research. Originality/value This is the first article of its kind to analyse and evaluate the implications of Ofsted reports on attendance issues within LEAs out‐of‐school units.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09513540710729935

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reid, K.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Reid, Ken
Venue
International Journal of Educational Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
144-157
ISSN
0951-354X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071561866
Cited by
6
References
13
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
school attendance, pupil referral units, local education authorities, school inspection, England

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review