Cultural diversity online: student engagement with learning technologies
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to focus on how students from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds encounter online learning environments, and to assess the extent to which cultural factors impact on learners' engagement with online learning. Design/methodology/approach: The study explores how a culturally diverse cohort of students engage with the organisational, technological and pedagogical aspects of online learning depicted in Conole's (2004) “framework for e‐learning”. A total of 241 students in online learning programs in a large university in South Australia were surveyed, yielding a response rate of 65 percent. Findings: Analysis indicated that cultural differences do have an impact on participant satisfaction with organisational and technological issues, with local respondents indicating significantly more positive perceptions than international respondents. Significant also was a reported lack of peer engagement and intercultural communication. Research limitations/implications: First, the study was restricted to students in one large university in Australia, using one in‐house online learning system, and studying business courses. Future research could replicate the study across a range of universities and across different countries, which would enhance generalisability. In addition, researchers can expand the model used in this study, testing other variables which impact on online learning. Practical implications: These differences in reported engagement with online learning reflect differences in students' experience of online courses as culturally inclusive, and have implications for the quality of online education. These reported experiences may be linked to the amount of communicative interaction among students. Originality/value: The paper examined the cultural aspects of student engagement with the organisational, technological and pedagogical components of online learning. Its findings suggest a direction to improve the quality of learning for all students by constructing a culturally inclusive online learning environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hannon and D'Netto (2007) found that international students experienced more challenges with technological aspects of online learning and more isolation in ALNs than their Australian peers.
“Specifically, international students experienced more challenges with technological aspects of online learning and more isolation in ALNs than their Australian peers.”
From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Hannon and D'Netto, 2007
Hannon and D'Netto (2007) found that international students differed from Australian students in terms of their perceptions of and satisfaction with their ALN experiences.
“The findings revealed that international students differed from Australian students in terms of their perceptions of and satisfaction with their ALN experiences.”
From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Hannon and D'Netto, 2007
The skills and experiences students bring to the distance learning environment are highly influenced by their cultural backgrounds.
“the skills and experiences students bring to the distance learning environment are highly influenced by their cultural backgrounds.”
From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Hannon and D'Netto (2007)
Cites
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thorne suggests that the use (“cultures-of-use”) of online communication tools “differs interculturally just as communicative genre, pragmatics, and institutional context would be expected to differ interculturally” ( Thorne, 2003”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Learning in an online distance education course: Experiences of three international students
Zhang, Z., & Kenny, R. (2010) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.775 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review
Uzuner, S. (2009) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.690 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Cross cultural analysis of the use and perceptions of web based learning systems
Arenas-Gaitán, J., Ramírez-Correa, P. E., & Javier Rondán-Cataluña, F. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.016 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gray, K., Chang, S., & Kennedy, G. (2010) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/14759390903579208 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Hillaire, G., & Whitelock, D. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.003 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hannon, J., & D'Netto, B.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- ORCID
- Hannon, John
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-06-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 418-432
- ISSN
- 0951-354X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010963628
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 32.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Management (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- cultural diversity, online learning, student engagement, international students, intercultural communication, peer engagement, e-learning framework, student satisfaction, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review