Cited by 166Online and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesEducational Technology and E-Learning

Cultural diversity online: student engagement with learning technologies

Hannon, John, D'Netto, Brian·2007·International Journal of Educational Management

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to focus on how students from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds encounter online learning environments, and to assess the extent to which cultural factors impact on learners' engagement with online learning. Design/methodology/approach: The study explores how a culturally diverse cohort of students engage with the organisational, technological and pedagogical aspects of online learning depicted in Conole's (2004) “framework for e‐learning”. A total of 241 students in online learning programs in a large university in South Australia were surveyed, yielding a response rate of 65 percent. Findings: Analysis indicated that cultural differences do have an impact on participant satisfaction with organisational and technological issues, with local respondents indicating significantly more positive perceptions than international respondents. Significant also was a reported lack of peer engagement and intercultural communication. Research limitations/implications: First, the study was restricted to students in one large university in Australia, using one in‐house online learning system, and studying business courses. Future research could replicate the study across a range of universities and across different countries, which would enhance generalisability. In addition, researchers can expand the model used in this study, testing other variables which impact on online learning. Practical implications: These differences in reported engagement with online learning reflect differences in students' experience of online courses as culturally inclusive, and have implications for the quality of online education. These reported experiences may be linked to the amount of communicative interaction among students. Originality/value: The paper examined the cultural aspects of student engagement with the organisational, technological and pedagogical components of online learning. Its findings suggest a direction to improve the quality of learning for all students by constructing a culturally inclusive online learning environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09513540710760192

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hannon and D'Netto (2007) found that international students experienced more challenges with technological aspects of online learning and more isolation in ALNs than their Australian peers.

    “Specifically, international students experienced more challenges with technological aspects of online learning and more isolation in ALNs than their Australian peers.”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Hannon and D'Netto, 2007

  • Hannon and D'Netto (2007) found that international students differed from Australian students in terms of their perceptions of and satisfaction with their ALN experiences.

    “The findings revealed that international students differed from Australian students in terms of their perceptions of and satisfaction with their ALN experiences.”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Hannon and D'Netto, 2007

  • The skills and experiences students bring to the distance learning environment are highly influenced by their cultural backgrounds.

    “the skills and experiences students bring to the distance learning environment are highly influenced by their cultural backgrounds.”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Hannon and D'Netto (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannon, J., & D'Netto, B.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Educational Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-06-26
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
418-432
ISSN
0951-354X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010963628
Cited by
166
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
32.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Management (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
cultural diversity, online learning, student engagement, international students, intercultural communication, peer engagement, e-learning framework, student satisfaction, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review